Stating portfolio and move San Francisco towards our stated goal for the board of supervisors on having a purely renewalable system by 2030 colleagues ive received a number of communications and meetings with groups and the chamber of commerce that are concerned about the ability to choose a power provider and, of course, this board strongly supports this unanimously the power sf program a choice and competition are good things i hope well move and the power sf will become a reality the majority of San Francisco doesnt have one provider they can use and we have another provider that has to go through the same rated process that provides the rate power and the Transbay Center and the tjpa recently decided to go with the puc has its power provider weve heard concerns about reliability and the puc is a reliable power provider to our airport or the General Hospital for years the power has gone out there so colleagues, i ask for your support of this important legislation which will move us
Effort from construction contract under 400,000 and professional contract under 100,000 before opening the process to nonlbes and it at 20 to 40 million and expands the projects that require a agreement to be approved by the board of supervisors and in Certain Industries that allows Small Businesses to participate in the lbe program to foster partnerships between established contractor and local businesses thank to the many actors it took a lot of effort from the departments as well as Small Businesses and i want to take a moment and thank our geocommittee for their support. Thank you supervisor avalos. Thank you just a question that was raised recently by some contractors with the city as related to architect addressed engineers i think they were looking for language it would be in here for contractors that get a better shot inclusion in this legislation and i wanted to ask the author what the discussion has been if theres a possibility for that inclusion and some other version that c
Supports this unanimously the power sf program a choice and competition are good things i hope well move and the power sf will become a reality the majority of San Francisco doesnt have one provider they can use and we have another provider that has to go through the same rated process that provides the rate power and the Transbay Center and the tjpa recently decided to go with the puc has its power provider weve heard concerns about reliability and the puc is a reliable power provider to our airport or the General Hospital for years the power has gone out there so colleagues, i ask for your support of this important legislation which will move us in a positive direction in terms of Climate Change and as well as addressing those are power needs in our system. Thank you, supervisor wiener. Supervisor tang thank you, supervisor wiener . An interesting proposal as you mentioned on many entities dont have a choice to some of the questions come up from the private entities that may fall und
Service including local control and lower rates and promotion of renewable and clean energy and Greater Transparency and accountability expanding the point of interest Enterprises Retail Customer Base instead of selling it well provide much needed revenue for the pucs system and our street light system thats a huge deferred infrastructure needs and the retail power is sold at three to four times as wholesale puc estimates 10 meg wauts was the it residence the net revenue so if the puc were able to increase the retail sales of electricity by one hundred megawatts that will generate 40 million in new revenue that could be reinvested in the system including our street light system pucs power enterprise facilities currently have massive deferred maintenance in the hundreds of dollars of thousand of maintenance in hetch hetchy and locally in our street light system weve seen the result off our deteriorated street light system where is the puc didnt have the revenues to modernize the system
Architects ill say at this point, im not adverse interests not an analysis or data to understand how seriously problems there are although weve heard anecdotal evidence of issues weve decided to ask the city administered to convene a working group to Work Together a gadget data specifically to look at the situation is of architects versus engineers and at the end of that time period the Zoning Administrator low provide an analysis and make recommendations open whether there should be additional categories for example, to cart out architect and set that aside as a specific category in indicating committee no one said theyre interested but if youre interested im sure that our Zoning Administrator naomi kelly will be taking recommendations that come out a month from now to potentially turn that into chapter 14. Ill foul. Thank you, colleagues take this item same house, same call . Passed on 7 first reading. Madam clerk. Item 46 was recommended a resolution to approve a contract between th