for me than it would have been without the pandemic. i could ve felt like i was reading a history of something weird and not that old but old enough to have nothing to do with my daily life now. but what you discovered in that book is that laboratories have been working with and playing around with vaccines for and terrible process pieces in the past. and the notion that things have escaped from laboratories involuntarily is something that we have seen before. and then, brings us up to last summer, and last winter, where you started contemplating the lab leak theory. just as others were. and now the president hat once investigated. how have have you seen this discussion evolve on the lab leak theory in the last few months? it was a fascinating process to write a book that was really
to quiz him if they would do it hard enough. and i mean they can be tougher nan the media. right. and nernd it s like a murder board before you go in oral argument it should be harder than the case that s clearly not what s happening. . i said two noontimes nights ago the management of this and the timing all the process pieces were terribly mishandled. you all have been talking about another one which is the changing narrative. and that just goes to the original point. this is a repeated problem. the management of the psa repeated problem in the first four months. can we just talk about the mystery about rosenstein tick is to that there is things we don t know i m confused i ve asked people whether whether it s stene ob stein. for wall all with he no he he wrote the memo i may have in fact recommended may have believed he should be fired and maybe be fired now he is a guy with great integrity. he would he would have been among those afflictle thought that comey did a horrible jo
that they re not in the same that there s disorganization in the white house and they don t really have the power to quiz the president and get their story straight? they do have the power to quiz him if they would do it hard enough. they can be tougher than the media. and they should be. it s like before you go into oral argument, it should be harder than the case. that s clearly not what s happening here. i said two nights ago, the management of this and timing, all the process pieces were terribly mishandle. you all have been talking about another one a changing narrative. that just goes to the original point. this is a repeated problem. the management of the process is a repeated problem in the first four months. can we talk about the mystery around rosenstein? there s things we don t know. i m confused. i ve asked people. for all we know, he wrote the memo. he may have in fact recommended
let me go to do you want to respond? these process pieces. a minute with you here. to me that piece talked a lot more than there was a lot of backstory there, a lot of importance. you wrote about process, sure, about how the campaign can t have a coherent message. the biggest message was it doesn t have a clear sense of why he s running. joy, do you want to jump in here. he called it a process piece. that s an interesting shot. chris, it was interesting. that was a ceo talking to his board of directors about why they had a bad quarter and explaining it away. that was not a guy who can explain to you at his core, at his gut why he wants to be president and what he thinks the country should be doing differently than it s doing now. that s what romney lacks. there s a thing that campaign staff does and jim probably knows about this, probably written about it, where you float an op-ed. you write an op-ed piece and you find someone to sign it. the romney campaign is an op-ed piece f
my senior combine people work extraordinarily well together. frankly, these process stories take away from what s really of concern to the american people. no changes in your campaign no, i have got a good team. let me go to do you want to respond? these process pieces. a minute with you here. to me that piece talked a lot more than there was a lot of backstory there, a lot of importance. you wrote about process, sure, about how the campaign can t have a coherent message. the biggest message was it doesn t have a clear sense of why he s running. joy, do you want to jump in here. he called it a process piece. that s an interesting shot. chris, it was interesting. that was a ceo talking to his board of directors about why they had a bad quarter and explaining it away. that was not a guy who can explain to you at his core, at his gut why he wants to be president and what he thinks the country should be doing differently than it s doing now. that s what romney lacks. there s