Everything. Please come to the marsh. It is such a great resource. My daughter has been involved for the last decade at the marsh. I wouldnt send her anywhere else. Thank you. Miss gallagher, i have several questions. How would you characterize the acoustical capacity of the marshs building . Im sorry, i didnt get that . How would you characterize the building that the marsh is in in terms of its ability to lock sounds from the adjacent properties . Its in pretty sad shape. We wish of were better. This is a nonprofit organization. It puts just about every cent it has into providing these sliding scales and Free Services to the community. We need a lot of money. One of the comments made by the permit holder was that this used to be a nightclub . It was forced to have provided a number of different Acoustical Solutions to reduce its nuisance value . I think stephanie can speak to that. I dont know too much about that. I think the acoustical done by my office is some corkboard. Thats abou
Bay, and in both instances it looks perfectly appropriate for the building. So i think those are some of the things that i see. I am not opposed to letting this rest for a few more weeks. We do not have to take it up in early january, but certainly i would like the continued dialogue between the comment and community and the developer. This is appropriate use and i see nothing wrong with a building that develop these 27 units, brings 27 new families that will add vitality to the neighborhood. I think that is a very valuable improvement and we have been done the road about the church and how expensive it would be to try to retrofit it. It doesnt economically seem to make a lot of sense. And this is a private project, too. This is not a cityowned project. This is not a project being done by an affordable nonprofit. This is a private project and there is they are responsible to be receptive to the neighborhood and build something that is appropriate to the neighborhood and is supported by
Given back. The community room, the carshare spaces, the three Community Spaces and the trees that were mentioned that are planned to be planted along both larkin and clay street with maintenance included. And the fact that the project sponsor has worked with the neighbors to try to decrease the size. One of the things that we called for and i would encourage him to continue to work with neighbors with particular reference to the adjacent building on clay and the Property Line windows. Although we know these are not protected, if there is a way that they can be worked out to allow light into as many as these as possible, that would be great. Although a lot has been done already. And then on some other issues regarding the redesign not the redesign, but the new project more properly state. One of the things mentioned in the complaints by the neighborhood and others is that typical finishs in the neighborhood are wood, brick and stucco and some of the earlier renderings had a lot of glas
Effective date basically saying that the Procedures Manual and associated documents do not become effective until this associated ordinance becomes effective. So those are two of the nonsubstantive changes that i think should be added to the resolution. The other in responding to representative for a project which you had approved in october. They were concerned that some of the changes might apply to this project, which you had approved, but they havent finalized their entitlements. This is a project that has some of the cdlacfunded units and they felt that going through the inclusionary housing might be burdensome for them. We dont think its burdensome and we dont think it was intended to apply to projects that you already approved and therefore, were recommending that you do a grandfathering for those projects. So that this ordinance and the change of procedures would only apply to those projects that are approved after the Effective Date of the ordinance. So i think that is appropr