Sites. I think that closes everything. Please come to the marsh. It is such a great resource. My daughter has been involved for the last decade at the marsh. I wouldnt send her anywhere else. Thank you. Miss gallagher, i have several questions. How would you characterize the acoustical capacity of the marshs building . Im sorry, i didnt get that . How would you characterize the building that the marsh is in in terms of its ability to lock sounds from the adjacent properties . Its in pretty sad shape. We wish of were better. This is a nonprofit organization. It puts just about every cent it has into providing these sliding scales and Free Services to the community. We need a lot of money. One of the comments made by the permit holder was that this used to be a nightclub . It was forced to have provided a number of different Acoustical Solutions to reduce its nuisance value . I think stephanie can speak to that. I dont know too much about that. I think the acoustical done by my office is
Recertification of income. The fourth point compliance is referenced to the land dedication to give additional instruction to the planners to identify in the review process whether the land dedication applies to a single site or multiple sites in cases where there are multiple parcels being dedicated under the land dedication model. Also under the land dedication model, we make clear that the approval letter that moe issues can change, but only under situations based on new information. But approval by the mayor and the board of supervisors is of course final. And finally, important insertion under our bmr rental to ownership conversion rule. Where the right of first refusal for the existing resident includes pricing at the original bmr rental rate. Or the actual income level of the renter, in cases where the existing occupant or tenant, their income has increased above the rental level. The pricing of the unit under that first right of first refusal scenario would be priced per their
Departments that will be presenting before the board. Corey the Zoning Administrator and tina tam representatives planning. Matthew green with department of building inspection. Arc leah gauge from Mayors Office of housing and kate connor planner with planning. The Board Meeting guide lines are the board request you silence electronic device. No eating or drinking in the room. Rules of presentation will appellates, permit hold and respondents upon given 7 minutes to present and 3 for rebuttal. People must include comments with the periods. Members who are not arc fitiated with up to 3 minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. Time may be limited to 2 minutes from there are a large number of speakers. Our Legal Assistance will give 30 seconds before your time is up. 4 votes to grant an appeal or rehearing if you have a question the board schedules, mail the board staff at sfgov. Org. Public access is important. Sfgovtv is broadcasting and live and receive Public Comment for eac