Is exploring Charity Foundations to further develop the law cabin ranch in Hidden Valley facilities. This recommendation is being implemented. The juvenile Probation Commission created an add hok community. Members of that commission have also expressed their interest in developing public, private partnerships to support the juvenile develop. This requires work and analysis. Partnership with the Mayors Office and the board of supervisors. As to recommendation 4. 2 to exam collaboration with regional counties to develop programs and address the needs of high kiss risk and at risk youth, this requires analysis. Weve reached out to our neighboring Probation Department as to a reasonable alternative to the division of the juvenile justice. Unfortunately those conversations were not fruitful. Theres new leadership including the leadership in our department and im happy to reinvigorate that conversation. In conclusion the juvenile Probation Department in conjunction with the other City Respo
Would like to direct the clerk and the budget analyst to prepare a motion that we made to update these to the recommendations. Is there a supervisor tang, did you make the motion. No, i did not, but i like to make a motion to, i guess update these recommendations. Thank you. Is there a second. Second. Excellent. Thank you so much. All right. Motion has been made and unanimously passes. Thank you. Okay. Were going to lose supervisor campos. Thank you for your services. Wonderful to have you. Dont worry everyone. Madam clerk, can you call item two and three together. Item number two is hearing on the recently published 20122013 civil grand jury report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report. Item number two is hearing on the recently published 20122013 civil grand jury report entitled Log Cabin Ranch planning for the future, a continuity report. Resolution responding to the presiding judge of the superior court on the findings and recommendations contained i
To sfmta. Is there no deferred maintenance here and other garages that it would be more appropriately used for . Well, thats what this bond issuance is for, in terms of an mta wide, so we can address concerns related to all the garages, not just japan center. Or Sutter Stockton. So, that is our main concern, is that knowing that not only this garage needs improvements, but citywide as well. I understand that, but that seems to me like youre taking bond money, then, and transferring it through a wheel to operational expenses. To the budget analyst analyst. Mr. Chair, as we understand it, the bonds that have been issued are taking care of their Capital Improvement needs. So, this in effect winds up as surplus and can be transferred for operating expenditures to the mta. So, theyre not short changing their Capital Needs as we understand it. Thank you, i appreciate that. I guess my question is but by issuing the debt, you say youre not short changing the Capital Needs, but tame point in ti
Thank you. We have ms. Howard here from our Mayors Office of budget. Good afternoon, supervisors, kate howard, [speaker not understood]. Im here before you to approve an event over the supplemental thats before you appropriating fund from our state revenue lost reserve to a variety of programs that were reduced in the governors budget last year. I also have with me staff from the Human Services agency, the department of aging Adult Services, juvenile probation, the department of Public Health, and the Arts Commission in the event that there are specific questions about any of the appropriations. As you will remember, last year the governors budget proposed and it was adopted by the legislature a number of reductions in both local revenues and direct cuts to services that affect the city of San Francisco. In anticipation of those cuts, the city appropriated 15 million pending final approval of the budget and so those funds are set aside in the event of state cuts. We are recommending in
Surplus and can be transferred for operating expenditures to the mta. So, theyre not short changing their Capital Needs as we understand it. Thank you, i appreciate that. I guess my question is but by issuing the debt, you say youre not short changing the Capital Needs, but tame point in time youre [speaker not understood] and youre issuing bonds against it for operational expenses. Youre floating bonds to float for operational expenses which we should not be doing. Youre correct in that sense. Well, our mta operating budget also supports the repayment of the bonds itself. For garage operations in terms of the capital improvements, we would be doing the same amount of work there as well in term of what would be available. Okay. Thanks. And to mr. Reiskin, just one more question. Obviously, and i absolutely understand this board and number of Restaurant Owners that weve gone through quite a bit and love the restaurants and people are involved in the community have influence and i think