To reconvene this wonderful meeting. I told you it was going to be fun today and i wasnt im glad i didnt disappoint. Now we have compliment. Supervisor campos made a few office and the Mayors Office, are they done with presenting. This is item number 1. I want to add one comment. On coit i think it would be great to fill the vacant see and we invite the it Tech Community to apply for thatcy and we invite the it Tech Community to apply for that i think the sooner we do that the better. Colleagues we need to provide new responses for 13 recommendations to the presiding judge. So are there thoughts on any of these suggestions in the matrix . Looks like the updates response from the Mayors Office is been acceptable. I dont know i guess starting with recommendation 4. Recommendation has been implemented and of course as we mentioned theres one other soul coming. I dont know if we should word interest as recommendation as implemented and ongoing. And what . Ongoing. Okay. You only need to sa
Seems to me like youre taking bond money, then, and transferring it through a wheel to operational expenses. To the budget analyst analyst. Mr. Chair, as we understand it, the bonds that have been issued are taking care of their Capital Improvement needs. So, this in effect winds up as surplus and can be transferred for operating expenditures to the mta. So, theyre not short changing their Capital Needs as we understand it. Thank you, i appreciate that. I guess my question is but by issuing the debt, you say youre not short changing the Capital Needs, but tame point in time youre [speaker not understood] and youre issuing bonds against it for operational expenses. Youre floating bonds to float for operational expenses which we should not be doing. Youre correct in that sense. Well, our mta operating budget also supports the repayment of the bonds itself. For garage operations in terms of the Capital Improvements, we would be doing the same amount of work there as well in term of what w
Capital improvement needs. So, this in effect winds up as surplus and can be transferred for operating expenditures to the mta. So, theyre not short changing their Capital Needs as we understand it. Thank you, i appreciate that. I guess my question is but by issuing the debt, you say youre not short changing the Capital Needs, but tame point in time youre [speaker not understood] and youre issuing bonds against it for operational expenses. Youre floating bonds to float for operational expenses which we should not be doing. Youre correct in that sense. Well, our mta operating budget also supports the repayment of the bonds itself. For garage operations in terms of the capital improvements, we would be doing the same amount of work there as well in term of what would be available. Okay. Thanks. And to mr. Reiskin, just one more question. Obviously, and i absolutely understand this board and number of Restaurant Owners that weve gone through quite a bit and love the restaurants and people
Okay. Seeing none, at this point id like to open up to Public Comment. Any members of the public that wish to comment on item number 2, please step forward. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Ill move the amendments recommended by the budget analyst. Okay. We have an amendment a motion to approve the amendments to make this retroactive to january 1st. We can do that without opposition. And we have a motion to move this forward so moved. To the full board with recommendation. We can do that without opposition. Mr. Clerk, can you please call item number 3 . Item number 3, resolution authorizing the office of Contract Administration to enter into the seventh amendment between the city and xtech part of the Technology Store procurement vehicle in which the amendment shall increase the contract amount from 60,490,000 to 90,580,000 for the period of january 1, 2009, through december 31, 2013. Thank you very much. Mr. Jones . Good morning, supervisors. Bill jones, office of Contract Admin
denticola thinks kennedy can bring americans together and isn t worried about him taking votes from biden or trump a person like bobby kennedy who is really a messenger of unity, a message for all people i think that s why he s going to actually pull a lot of voters from both sides that s back on deal s farm. i shared desire for unity to address a deeply divided country. if we don t make some changes and find somebody who has creative solutions and somebody we can trust who wants to bring us together? we re gonna be on a world of hurt even rfk junior seemed to be pulling more votes away from biden or trump based on who you spoke to anderson kennedy s coalition of voters, they ve really span the political spectrum polling data does indicate the largest contingent could actually be those who didn t support either candidate in 2020. a lot of his support comes from the so-called double-haters. those holding unfavorable views of both biden and trump anderson, even mechan thanks