Google is facing class-action style litigation in the Netherlands which accuses the adtech giant of breaching European privacy laws. It's demanding Google Google is facing class-action style litigation in the Netherlands which accuses the adtech giant of breaching European privacy laws.
shouldn t worry about where your dna ends up. which how it s archived or used. do you buy that, though? do you see that privacy needs to be protected, as well, in a certain way? i think there s obviously privacy interests. when we start talking about people putting their into things like ged match or family dna, these folks area agreeing to allow law enforcement to use their dna, like anybody else booemp going in to find their biological parents that were adopted, all those things. should we have guardrails? absolutely. things like what we call informed consent, making sure that people understand what their dna is being used for. that s the thing that made the thing concerned about and something that we are very mindful and particularly in law enforcement that we follow what we call best practices. thank you so much for being with us. you ve been a pipioneer, and agn we learned this week how
of the settlement that a judge sealed from public view in this case. why? why is that? good morning, sarah. it s a the reason the judge sealed. it is because the beneficiary of that settlement is the minor son. that s what the court does is. it weighs the interests the privacy interests of the minor son. and against the public interest in having this information available and they you know, the court ruled that the interests of the sun the privacy interests of the minor child would prevail, and that s why it was sealed. um so right now, nobody is going to know what that settlement says there will be hearings related to that settlement will all be sealed, and that is primarily to protect the privacy interests of the child who is going to be a beneficiary of that settlement. you know, i m curious because having a civil settlement before there is a criminal trial. in
back to our breaking news. the justice department just releasing the mar-a-lago search warrant affidavit. it includes 38 pages of material, much of it heavily redacted. we do know what type of information is redacted in a memo to the court, the doj laid out five categories of information that they re trying to protect. witness information, information that could provide a roadmap to the investigation, information about the grand jury, information about law enforcement personnel and a category of just other privacy interests. our panel is back to discuss along with pam brown, cnn anchor and senior washington correspondent. pam, you re just joining us, so i m starting with you. alisyn asked about the timeline of the collection of the boxes in january. it s may before they go through these boxes. and we saw this exchange, this letter from the national archives a couple days ago saying it s been four weeks since we had an exchange over this. talk about the degree of
state in the arena of religion. whether it is now taxpayer dollars that can go to fund religious schools, whether it s the dobbs case, the abortion case, but that has deep underpinnings in religion because we have the courtsiding with the unborn over the born. they re sacrificing the born, women, their privacy interests, autonomy, their ability to make their own health decisions, they re sacrificing those for the unborn. that s hard to see that anything but a religiously-driven opinion and something that s troubling is when they say public school teachers and coaches can basically hold prayer, student-involved prayer on public property and what that does is, it really it s unfair and potentially to