along with analysts chuck rosenberg and lisa rubin. what can we expect based on arguments put forward in advance by both sides? reporter: to set the scene, because donald trump is here in person the security has really been ramped up. there s a much greater police presence. in terms of in the courtroom, this is a long shot for donald trump, this idea that a former president can t be prosecuted for any acts whited while serving in offense, it s belied by the fact that gerald ford pardoned richard nixon. this three-judge panel is an all-female panel with two judges appointed by president biden and one appointed by former president george h.w. bush. in addition to arguing immunity, trump lawyers are also making the argument that this produce is improper under double jeopardy. ken, i need to interrupt you because the hearing is starting. let s listen in right now. our jurisdiction was challenged by an amicus. you are not questioning our collateral order jurisdiction? [indis
been assassinated while delivering a speech at a campaign event. translation: | pray that - somehow his life could be spared but unfortunately he passed away despite these prayers. this is truly unfortunate and i have no words to express how i feel. britain s cameron norrie is about to face serbia s 20 time grand slam champion novak djokovic in wimbledon s last semi final with the winner to face australia s nick kyrios on sunday. hello, everybody. hello, everybody welcome to. hello, everybody. hello, everybody welcome to. we hello, everybody. hello, everybody welcome to. we will hello, everybody. hello, everybody welcome to. we will be hello, everybody. hello, everybody welcome to. we will be trying - hello, everybody. hello, everybody welcome to. we will be trying to l welcome to. we will be trying to speak to these two paramedics about their viral video sensation, if they stop laughing. durham police have announced that the labour leader sir keir starmer and his dep
the question about what nixon knew, was well nixon knew everything today he was implicated in awe, draw parallels between the hearings and the january six public hearings that are now unfolding half a century over so far this look committees presenting compelling evidence that that president donald trump knew he lost the election, and that president trump knew s election fraud, they knew the plot over joe biden s election was illegal among constitutional evidence that trump was cheating around pence letting him down even after he knew he had breached the capitol. and yet, despite all of that trump went ahead with his scheme, his spot, his tweets the whole january 6th attack on democracy anyway, and well richard nixon resigned rather than face impeachment. while nixon left opposite of his own volition, trump probably wants to be president again. and turn that up at a right-wing conference the day after the third 16. hearing the day after the president, to murdering his vice
office seeker versus office holder. what is your position would we have to remand it? would the district judge to decide in the first instance whether these various the four points that the defense has made against imposing criminal liability hinge on whether the acts are ministerial, discretionary, official, private, or however you want to characterize it? i would use the phrase clinton against jones, purely private conduct is what can be subject to judicial process after a president leaves office. in response to your question, our principle position is you can look at this indictment and it alleges official acts and it can be dismissed. we acknowledge the district court didn t reach that issue and the court has the discretion to remand to the district court for the application of the doctrine of criminal immunity in the first instance and we admit that would be a natural thing
to grow the break up the united kingdom. i want to grow the economy. there is no basis to grow the economy. there is no basis for to grow the economy. there is no basis for an to grow the economy. there is no basis for an alliance of the party who wants basis for an alliance of the party who wants to put a border between england who wants to put a border between england and scotland. it is an in principle england and scotland. it is an in principle position. there is no basis principle position. there is no basis for principle position. there is no basis for an alliance in the keir starmer basis for an alliance in the keir starmer government between labour and the starmer government between labour and the snp. so far as the lib dems are concerned, we want a labour majority are concerned, we want a labour majority. we want to deliver on our mission majority. we want to deliver on our mission. that is what we wanted. anyone mission. that is what we wanted. anyone