along with analysts chuck rosenberg and lisa rubin. what can we expect based on arguments put forward in advance by both sides? reporter: to set the scene, because donald trump is here in person the security has really been ramped up. there s a much greater police presence. in terms of in the courtroom, this is a long shot for donald trump, this idea that a former president can t be prosecuted for any acts whited while serving in offense, it s belied by the fact that gerald ford pardoned richard nixon. this three-judge panel is an all-female panel with two judges appointed by president biden and one appointed by former president george h.w. bush. in addition to arguing immunity, trump lawyers are also making the argument that this produce is improper under double jeopardy. ken, i need to interrupt you because the hearing is starting. let s listen in right now. our jurisdiction was challenged by an amicus. you are not questioning our collateral order jurisdiction? [indis
happening now breaking news the white house just released the results of president biden s physical exam. his doctor declaring the president remains healthy and vigorous. will not have any impact on voter concerns about his age? also a new valve by the president to shoot down anything in the sky that threatens the u.s. he is speaking out for the first time about the downing of three unidentified objects saying there is no evidence they are linked to china or its spy balloon. a special grand jury investigating trump says some witnesses may have lied in their testimony about efforts to overturn george s 2020 election results. we are breaking down the new revelations about the probe and the possibility of perjury charges. in the united states and around the world, i am pamela brown and you re in the situation room. this is cnn breaking news. let s get to the breaking news. the just results of president biden s annual checkup. the information about his health taking on adde
office seeker versus office holder. what is your position would we have to remand it? would the district judge to decide in the first instance whether these various the four points that the defense has made against imposing criminal liability hinge on whether the acts are ministerial, discretionary, official, private, or however you want to characterize it? i would use the phrase clinton against jones, purely private conduct is what can be subject to judicial process after a president leaves office. in response to your question, our principle position is you can look at this indictment and it alleges official acts and it can be dismissed. we acknowledge the district court didn t reach that issue and the court has the discretion to remand to the district court for the application of the doctrine of criminal immunity in the first instance and we admit that would be a natural thing
messages and signals of support tonight. of course everyone wishes the senator well. he has been trying to move past his health conditions but the senate should be reflective of the country and this is one thing that millions and millions of americans deal with and senators do as well. he is fortunate he can seek out the care that so many cannot. just ahead for you, the other major story out of the white house. president biden speaking out for the first time about the unidentified object shutdown by u.s. fighter jets over north america. what he said and didn t say up next. so, polly traded in her hats to help earn her grad cap! your past experience can help you earn your degree faster and for less. get started at phoenix.edu sometimes you re so busy taking care of everyone else you don t do enough for yourself, or your mouth.
the speech and debate clause which protects congress and members communications from being exposed if they were legislative in nature. but you have a very compelling and important criminal investigation happening here. so the fact that the district court didn t just dismiss this out of hand tells you that they are acknowledging the importance of this investigation, the fact that it is criminal in nature, very different from a and so we are going to see how it balances out between the speech and debate clause and the imperative nature of conducting a criminal inquiry. what do you think? i m thinking about this from the political context. it is not just scott perry who was involved. there were five republicans including the present speaker of the house kevin mccarthy who refused to testify to the january 6th committee, the now