transparency. mark: attorney-client privilege denied donald trump in document case, litigated in secret. we have not read the order in which the judge issued. i assume that judge in florida will have an opportunity to figure it out. it is difficult to see how you have due process with information you discussed with your lawyer is now the basic information used by government against you, i can t think of another system like this,. this is a very high bar. just so public understands, not that what if i do this or do this or do that? that is fair game. the issue is, when you try to get your lawyer, look. frank, myself lawy my theilawyer frank, i need to destroy the documents that is anti an exception.
much su substantive information to me is the 64 thousand dollar, now i ll say, 1.2 billion dollar question, if joe biden was assisting his son, just by taking phone calls, showing up at golfing events having the people at the office, having dinner with them twice in washington, d.c., is he not a coconspirator in violation of farra . it you are right. as you know, conspiracy laws take you to one overt act, in furtherance of the conspiracy. just to one. just one, vert. in in case. you had joe biden over 20 times whether on phone or in two cases he sat down for
transparency. mark: attorney-client privilege denied donald trump in document case, litigated in secret. we have not read the order in which the judge issued. i assume that judge in florida will have an opportunity to figure it out. it is difficult to see how you have due process with information you discussed with your lawyer is now the basic information used by government against you, i can t think of another system like this,. this is a very high bar. just so public understands, not that what if i do this or do this or do that? that is fair game. the issue is, when you try to get your lawyer, look. frank, myself lawy my theilawyer frank, i need to destroy the documents that is anti an exception.
venue. mark: they would start investigation in one place and move it to another this violates rules of department of justice, there are a lot of reasons you could can do that if you are a sleazy prosecutor. you are making a points, i m reading here. that a lot of stuff took place in the grand jury in washington, d.c. that the grand jury and judge in florida can t know about. you are talking about sanitizing this process. i assume some of that i m guessing has to do with attorney-client privilege, past people that i talked to faced that man smith, say that is who h what he does, he pierces the privilege by hook or crook, gets it in front of grand jury, and this case moved it to a different grand jury, the grand jury and judge in
political inest. mark: do you know where that case is now? a good point, you had a residing judge in dc that had a case that became indicted to florida. but there is a lot of shenanigans in terms of grand jury usage, you don t do it for a year only to move to another district. unless there is more to the story i m concerned from of the abusive behaviors played out in front of the grand jury in dc, whenne florida got was a much sanitized version. i m not on the case, there will be litigation, i assume that relates to these issues of how grand jury was used orel hershisor obussed this new territory when doj shifting investigation at last minute to different