Turkey, jordan and arab allies if it is to be a coalition, and if arab muslim participation is crucial to some ultimate success . Is a public role possible for them . The public role is not only possible, its essential. If were going to turn the momentum against the extremists and the terrorists and the fanatics and the violence users inside of that strand of islam, its got to be led by the mainstream islamists. Theres no alternative. I believe it is possible now for two reasons, one is because of isis and who they threaten. It is very clear that they threaten those same countries. The existence of the government in those countries. And the second reason is that what the president is doing and king for us to openly Fund Training and equipment under title 10, hes asked for 500 million for training and equipment and hes asked for specific support and authority to train and equip. He already has the authority, by the way. The reason for asking for that open authority under title 10 which
[indiscernible] unifying framework that should not deal with repression. We cannot wait until more people are killed. We cannot overcome terrorism unless society is effected. Such as what we see in syria. In this regard, we need to refer to the following items. We have for the military action. S not the sole solution to bee clinical aspect credible, and we should avoid double standards. When civilians are aimed, the response needs to be the same regardless of the origins of this violence against civilians. One cannot stand by while thousands are killed. There is always the explanation for this but i fear that this gives a sense that there is a double standard. You we need to ensure the rule of law and civilians should not be the victims once again. [indiscernible] all efforts that are based on International Consensus to put an end to this scourge regardless of its motivations or the excuses given for it. I want to thank his highness for his statement. Unfortunately, i am being called t
He said the time has finished, so i will have to finish. Can you hear me . Were good to go . Okay. Im going to ask a few questions and engage in a bit of discussion here, and then turn it over for questions. Sir, one thing thats allowed isis the Islamic State to make gains in iraq have been the divisions in iraqi politics and iraqi society. Theres been a lot that iraq is developing a more inclusive government, but your government doesnt have a minister of defense, it doesnt have a minister of interior, theres a plan to engage the sunni tribes but the plan has not yet been implemented. Can iraq form a truly inclusive government now given all the failures of the past . Why can it work this time when it hasnt worked before . Tep interpr translator before there werele many sensitivities between various iraqi groups. In iraq, we are still dealing as groupswere many sensitivities between various iraqi groups. In iraq, we are still dealing as groups who unfortunately citizenship has not been
Ideas these extremist and to save myd 72 setsill fixed into and groups, one of them will survive and all 70 others are going to finish. That means they are not real muslims. Is no sayinghere like this of prophet mohammed but this is the threat among extremist. I dont inc. Prophet mohammed could say this. There is no doubt that al qaeda is the base of this ideology to fight the soviet occupation of the country. Gradually andd managed to have ranches in other countries, in the gulf and iraq. The people who were in baghdad at times when they were supervising these prisons, these , thosest prisons thatogies married and from marriage, isis came out. When we try to look at the difference between isis and other organizations, we the other organizations are boundary, oneone border. Isis is different. Isis is an International Terrorist organization. They are interested in the whole world. They have a specific target against one authority, but isis that name to form a state rings together the en
The issue that came up around the cranium crisis is one of timing. That was a crisis that was shortterm. L and g had asked working gas is and exporting gas is longer. If that is the direction the u. S. Policy once to go, there is no reason the u. S. Could not be a large exporter of gas. The other hiccup with that thinking is the u. S. Energy system isnt government controlled. The federal government may have had every reason to want to bring gas to ukraine at that point, but there is not a history of telling the gas stations where to direct their gas. We let the market do that. There are couple of changes that would be required to get to that point. Mr. Chandra when i think about some of the hurdles of oil now we are not the low cost producer. In shell gas, we are. We are at the low end of the spectrum. In oil, we can export. Gas companies have adjusted their capacity to this lower gas prices world. The Oil Producers are about to undergo a very traumatic few years and adjustment. I feel