Ambiciozni predsednik Å kode sporoÄa tekmecem
Termometer prikaže, kako vroÄ je Älanek. Skupni seÅ¡tevek je kombinacija Å¡tevila klikov in komentarjev. 1,67 Nova fabia bo kot predstavnica cenovno ugodnejÅ¡ega razreda majhnih avtomobilov pomembna pri nadaljnjem dvigu Å kodinega tržnega deleža. Foto: Å koda
NekoÄ zgolj vzhodnoevropska poceni Å koda namerava postati peta najuspeÅ¡nejÅ¡a avtomobilska znamka v Evropi. KljuÄ do prodajne rasti bo po besedah predsednika izrazitejÅ¡a prisotnost v manjÅ¡ih razredih.
Lansko leto je Å koda sklenila na osmem mestu med avtomobilskimi znamkami v Evropi, kažejo podatki Evropskega združenja avtomobilskih proizvajalcev ACEA. Prodali so 643 tisoÄ avtomobilov. V letu, ki ga je zaznamovala epidemija covid-19, jim je prodaja sicer padla, toda svoj tržni delež v Evropi so poveÄali z 4,8 na 5,4 odstotka.
Zamena za Škodu Citigo će biti električni model baziran na Volkswagenu ID 1
naslovi.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from naslovi.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Nasljednik Škode Citigo će biti električni model baziran na Volkswagenu ID 1
klix.ba - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from klix.ba Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
against me and then i ll decide whether i want you to talk to me. the whole system would fall apart. i think robert mueller is showing incredible deference to president trump, and at some point he needs to make a decision whether he serves a subpoena and risks that constitutional crisis or decides to simply forego it. is it necessary in every single case to talk to a target? no. it s useful especially when someone is charged with having a corrupt intent to tell their side of the story. but if president trump does not want to avail himself of that opportunity to tell his side of the story, i think robert mueller will just move on. very quickly, before i let you go, i ll ask will to put up a tweet that the president out there with regard to public opinion. with regard to that, does the president damage his own potential defense by continuing to chime in and sort of partake in these attacks? i think that most lawyers would advise their client not to talk in these situations, because a
well, that is classic obstruction or witness intimidation under u.s. law. so i think it raises some very serious questions, and both the so-called tapes tweet in which he, the president said, warned comey about tapes, and his admission that he wanted to impact the director s testimony, will be considered by direct mueller in evaluating whether that was obstruction of justice. the president is doing a lot of damage to himself and he should just stop. jeffrey, did the president damage his credibility with the false tapes claim? i mean, who will believe him the next time? and chillfully essence. the fact of the matter is director comey himself admitted finally that he leaked a government memorandum to a pal to get it in the front pages of