fraud and deceit to impair, obstruct and defeat the lawful federal government function. by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted and certified. of course, in the world we live in today, there is a whole machinery that exists, solely to defend donald trump. is it s a reason for being. and the folks that do that, day and night, day after day. just going to throw out whatever defense they can. even if the defenses are entirely inconsistent or intention with each other. but, the ex president is facing a serious trial. arguably the most consequential of our lifetime. and he will, as is his right now an actual defense. not the nonsense being spewed on social media or propaganda outlets. but a natural defense, in a court of law, under the rules of evidence before a jury of his peers. who will ascertain whether or not he committed these crimes. beyond a reasonable doubt standard. and there are defenses to be
senate. there s been no civil civil liability. this is the only chance to hold him liable for trying to essentially end american democracy. if he can get away with this without even trying to put him on trial, any future candidate who might look for extra legal means to try to turn himself from election loser to an election winner. i said this before, but the u.s. is not the only country in the world. there are many countries that have been experiences with different forms of government. and there have been attempted coups in countries that were
Häme Police Department and the National Bureau of Investigation (KRP) on Thursday reported that they are about to wrap up two pre-trial investigations into a suspected far-right terrorist plot devised by four Finnish men.
Under 15-year-olds in Finland were suspected of 58 per cent more assaults and 60 per cent more robberies in the first six months of 2023 than in the corresponding period in 2022, reports Helsingin Sanomat.
opposed upon him that jake described as having assumed, picked up and blown up by media. well, tell me what are the chances here because obviously you have mentioned, he is already served a great part of his sentence. he s actually then released, he s now coming back, a guilty plea obviously forecloses a trial, it forecloses your appellate rights. many people in the audience may not understand. and they ve heard of the stricken casts, of ineffective assistance of counsel for any lawyer to have that accusation wielded it can be very damning. i know you have praised this client and not being critical about him, but what is the ultimate goal here, to be able to have a re-trial? to be say i d like to be tried? obviously he can t do away with what he s already served? yeah, so i can t speak for jake. i can certainly tell you what i know is in the pleadings and i can tell you from a procedural