comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Prafullar hede - Page 1 : comparemela.com

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: April 2024 [Citations 176

Nominal Index [Citation 176 - 236]Suhas Manohar Wankhede v. Election Commission of India & Others 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 176Kirloskar Pneumatic Company v. Kataria Sales Corporation 2024 LiveLaw (Bom).

Tamil naduIndia generalJustice mangeshs patilVijayv chowguleRaj thackerayJustice arifJustice devendra upadhyayaJusticekr shriramJustice devendra kumar upadhyayaLohasingh ramavadh yadavSarang wadhawanRajendra patil yedravkarNilesh chandrakant kambleSuketu shahJustice rajeshs patilDawoodi bohra

Bombay High Court Weekly Round-up: April 22

Nominal Index [Citation 221 - 234]Telex Advertising Pvt Ltd v. Central Railway 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 221Glencore India Pvt Ltd v. Amma Lines Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 222Mahendra Bansilal Patil v..

Taher fakhruddinChandurkar justice jitendra jainJustice nitin jamdarMufaddal saiffuddinJustice sandeepJustice mangeshs patilJustice shaileshp brahmeDawoodi bohraJusticekr shriramRajendra patil yedravkarSyedna mohammed burhanuddinJustice firdoshp pooniwallaShramik janata sanghJustice bharati dangreNilesh chandrakant kambleGita jain

Tata Steel Entitled To Treat Contribution Of Rs 212 52 Crores To CAF As Revenue Expenditure: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that Tata Steel is entitled to treat the contribution of Rs. 212.52 crores to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF) as revenue expenditure.The bench of Justice K. R..

Suresh kumarJusticekr shriramPrafullar hedeTata steelCompensatory afforestation fundBombay high courtBombay high court goa benchJustice neela gokhaleGoa benchIncome taxAssessing officerIncome tax appellate tribunalFor appellantTata steelRevenue expenditure

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.