Nominal Index [Citation 176 - 236]Suhas Manohar Wankhede v. Election Commission of India & Others 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 176Kirloskar Pneumatic Company v. Kataria Sales Corporation 2024 LiveLaw (Bom).
Nominal Index [Citation 221 - 234]Telex Advertising Pvt Ltd v. Central Railway 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 221Glencore India Pvt Ltd v. Amma Lines Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 222Mahendra Bansilal Patil v..
The Bombay High Court has held that Tata Steel is entitled to treat the contribution of Rs. 212.52 crores to the Compensatory Afforestation Fund (CAF) as revenue expenditure.The bench of Justice K. R..
The Court appreciated the endeavour of Goa government to frame an Act in the year 2000 to create robust infrastructure for catering to damage and ill effects caused by mass transportation of materials to waterbodies.
The high court directed two engineering students to do community service for two hours daily for two months, giving them relief from strict action by their college after they apparently stole chips, chocolates, pens during a conference.