Federal program monitors that the California Department of education were asking us or mandating we do that. We did ask for clarification and the clarification came back that due to the williams settle only we had to replace students with pupil in any of our documents pertaining to the williams act but not in any other document. So thats why i wanted to make sure that we are no longer saying that we are replacing our references to students with pupils. Just on williams act items . Yes. Any comments on the board on this item . Yes. I wanted to propose a small amendment to the author, under j, on the type of conduct, it says displaying sexually suggestive objects, i would like to add or images. Just to emphasize that when we are talking about Sexual Harassment its not just physical contact but it could be images of sexually suggestive objects. It gap can be on a phone or computer or a poster. Because people should understand how broad Sexual Harassment is. I would like to ask if that can
Say constitute a possible hate crime. Reporter frank, Richmond Police tell me it appears that the two letters came from the same person, and that this case is a priority. Football practice after school is a familiar routine. But something disturbing happened on september 12 and again one week later when the School Received anonymous letters. The first starts saying your so called students are a nuisance at the plaza where my bus is located. The next says i can only hope and pray that the next School Shooting happens soon. Im very concerned. We dont know who this person was. Reporter parents are being update about the letters through threatening calls. School officials tell us there is added security on campus, and police have stepped up patrols. Investigators say there are several plazas in the area, and that theyve interviewed business owners. I advise my child to just be alert and know who youre surrounded by. Reporter parents also express concern about the racist remarks included in
Same person, and that this case is a priority. Football practice after school is a familiar routine. But something disturbing happened on september 12 and again one week later when the School Received anonymous letters. The first starts saying your so called students are a nuisance at the plaza where my bus is located. The next says i can only hope and pray that the next School Shooting happens soon. Im very concerned. We dont know who this person was. Reporter parents are being update about the letters through threatening calls. School officials tell us there is added security on campus, and police have stepped up patrols. Investigators say there are several plazas in the area, and that theyve interviewed business owners. I advise my child to just be alert and know who youre surrounded by. Reporter parents also express concern about the racist remarks included in the letter. Im just disappointed. Im shocked. Obviously, somebody whos angry. Reporter the district is prepared. We do take
If someone is engaging in Sexual Harassment we would want to educate them on why thats not right and not the proper thing to do. Im wondering, so im fine with this if our practice is to actually educate our students on it and but if it is not clearly practice in this school district, then i think there should be something added that its a disciplinary measure also includes and education or some education component on it to cease behavior. Maybe you can clarify this for me, mr. Davis . Well, i cant clarify that that education component is part of this policy. We could make sure that its included in a complimentary administrative regulation. We can atd that specificity there. Mr. Davis . Madam president , board, it could also be tucked under any appropriate action under disciplinary action. You have to take classes and be counseled. It can fit under any appropriate action. Under the student part it doesnt say appropriate actions it says the district will take any action against any emplo
Okay. I wanted to echo the 6th grader question on page 5, the 10th slide which is who is going to be grading the culmination for the explanation questions . Depending on the type of questions it might be a 1 word answer, the computer will be able to do that. Depending if they are a longer response, there will be some Artificial Intelligence but always against real people as well. So depending on the type of items but also anyone thats created by the computer by Artificial Intelligence will also be graded by people as well. So, 2 years from now when its the real test, it will be all electronic, all on computers, is that correct . My question is will we have the capacity to do that, to have every student on a computer at the same time . So, yes, all the test will be on Computers Starting next school year. And we should have the capacity. It shouldnt be an issue. If i may just a clarifying question. Commissioner wynns . Its not a capacity where every student will be taking it at the same