to m next was done in august. before i move on to my next question, was done in august. before i move on to my next question, you was done in august. before i move on to my next question, you say - was done in august. before i move on to my next question, you say it - to my next question, you say it wasn t relevant in the earlier period. forthose wasn t relevant in the earlier period. for those on low incomes who kept the country going, working in food processing plants, in transport, in social care through lockdown, it was highly relevant, wasn t it? . , wasn t it? and there was considerable wasn t it? and there was considerable support - wasn t it? and there was considerable support in i wasn t it? and there was - considerable support in place for the most considerable support in place for the most vulnerable, as i have documented in my previous answers. not only documented in my previous answers. not only did documented in my previous answers. not only did we
scientific and health advisers. obviously there is a justification for the thia system within its own parameters but was it not apparent that it was a bit of a chance as to whether or not epidemiologically it would work. there is a system in place. in would work. there is a system in lace. . would work. there is a system in lace, . . ., , would work. there is a system in lace. . u, , ., , place. in which case i would “ust oint to place. in which case i would “ust point to the fi place. in which case i would “ust point to the remarks place. in which case i would “ust point to the remarks of place. in which case i would “ust point to the remarks of the h place. in which case i would just i point to the remarks of the deputy chief medical officer on the 20th of october in the press conference where he was asked and he said this national firebreak you talk about, no i don t think it s right and i don t think it s consistent with the epidemiological picture we are sa
designed to waste huge amounts of my time i will personally hand curve her and escort her from the building. had you got form, mr cummings, for. studio: apologies for some of the languages used. this is a live stream of the uk covid inquiry and we are seeing messages containing course language. language. we cannot keep dealing with this horrific meltdown. page 10 of 283282. we have to get helen out of here. he is trying to get spads fired. can we get her in monday for her chat to her moving. we need her out asap. building millions of lovely houses. studio: again apologies for the language being used in this live stream. we will see a way in which you speak of a professional scientist who gave his time, and considerable amounts of energy to sage. professor neil ferguson, a third of the way down, we should get someone to hammer ferguson. mr cummings. was that aggressive and foul mouthed an misogynistic approach the correct wray to manage fellow professionals? i approach the cor
lockdown inviting them to a bring your own booze party to which about 30 or a0 people turned up in the gardens in lockdown. that was breaching rules because of the time you are only allowed to meet with one other person from outside your household outside. even that day, government officials had been on television warning people that those were the rules. so it was seen very much as a real embarrassment at the very least to the government at the time, orwhen very least to the government at the time, or when it came out, rather, a year later. so they will be no doubt that will be talked about in question today in the inquiry. then we will be hearing from lee cain, the director of communications for the director of communications for the prime minister, and that is going to be significant also, because we have also had an indication of the private correspondence going on between lee cain and other senior officials during that time which gives you a bit of a glimpse of some of t