Edition of hannity. Well, it looks like tonight juno breaking news. Rfk jrr after being treated lin garbage by the entire Democratic Party and the media mob is now planning to announce ,according to reports, a third party run for the presidency. Son fo what impact will that hai on the race . Thats anybodys guesss as ofs now. Well have details coming up straight ahead. Also also tonight, well, we are at the end of what is another disastroussterous week for president joe biden. Look at this. The vast majority of americans he believe joe is mentally, physically incapable of bein ogr president. He could barely walk down the baby steps of air force wit one, even with no Special Shoes since they started operation keep joe from falling. His own staff Working Overtimepn to keep that from ever happening again. In and what so far got off toa pretty bad start. He looks terrible. And by the way, hes now drawi literally drawinngg comparisons to the crypt keeper. I mean, he just looks awful. Hes now
A third principle is judicial review. Here i would just remind the committee about the supreme courts decision in trump versus mazar. The court said about this committee that in fact it has to conduct the investigation for a legitimate purpose. A Fishing Expedition is not a legitimate purpose. Moreover, the court in the trump case it is not a legitimate purpose for the house or House Committee to be conducting the function of law enforcement. I heard many references here to criminal misbehavior, to whether or not somebody should be thrown in jail. Criticisms of a prosecutor, mr. Weiss. That sounds to me like an attempt to really substitute for the properly legitimate proceedings of the house. Two other safeguards real quickly. One is that these proceedings should be based on principle, not partisanship. I fear that what were hearing today, which can be traced back to 2019, and accusations made against mr. Biden are driven bipartisan animus more than principle. A final safeguard is for
Two women from Harare s Mbare suburb, who are in a polygamous marriage, allegedly ganged up to assault their husband s newly found lover to stop her from becomi.
kennedy said good and honorable people can disagree about same-sex marriage. we don t have that in the context of interracial marriage in loving versus virginia. gorsuch ice opinion saying the glory of the first amendment is a capacity to deal with speech we hate. i noticed that she pivoted in the number of ways and saying, oh, this doesn t pertain to somebody at a lunch counter. this doesn t pertain to a wedding web designer who doesn t want to do a wedding for a couple that was polygamist or what have you. what about the web designer who says i do not cater and make messages or websites for interracial couples, right? because that actually falls, you know outside of both of her exceptions, and it s squarely protected under this holding, that i could say i m a christian web designer. i don t believe in interracial marriages so therefore i m not going to design a website for you. the idea that that international couple or same-sex couple could