comments, but they like the tax cuts and there are certain policies they like, so they try to excuse it. stephen ross is going out and raising we re not just talking about a $20,000 fund-raiser. he s raising millions and millions of dollars for donald trump. i m not even talking about the fund-raiser. a lot of these are my friends and i m embarrassed and it changes the way i feel about them, because again, if you re somebody who thinks he ll put food your table, and we know better and we just came off a week where his exact words were words used in a manifesto of someone who killed, a mass slaughter. you have to say i m okay with that then. here s a fundamental thing about how the election works. this is my political science professor hat, not my journalist hat. i ve always been doubtful of swing voters, but what you have is a certain slice of voters and our electorate who, as you mentioned, i like the tax cuts okay, it comes with a side of racism, right? well, that s now bec
most important part of this particular political battle. i completely agree. this is my political science professor hat now. the message doesn t matter in a mid-term. we don t have a parliament. if the public is unhappy with the sit go party they ll vote for the other option and that generally means democrats. there is no democrat that could get into a scandal could destroy things across the country. the most important thing democrats need worry about, this is not a message issue per se, it is just structural. they look to look at places like georgia where you literally have someone who might be the republican nominee for governor who will say i ll make sure no one can get the vote. that s where democrats need to put up the money. they ll have the these. i can t. if people show up to sxroet if there are long lines, that could destroy what has been wave during in the last 18 months. i want to say this question of which tack they should take, is it message?
and she keeps telling them, this is you, this is you, you re in this fight. what i thought is that enthusiasm piece is clear. she sees it clearly. what matters is enthusiasm. people want to fight and you re stoking them to do that. and one of the things you get from the concern, they don t have a message. and a, that s not true. there s been a lot of messaging. also, it is not quite clear that that is what matters here. the activation seems the me the most important part of this particular political battle. i completely agree. this is my political science professor hat now. the message doesn t matter in a mid-term. we don t have a parliament. if the public is unhappy with the sit go party they ll vote for the other option and that generally means democrats. there is no democrat that could get into a scandal could destroy things across the country. the most important thing democrats need worry about, this is not a message issue per se, it is just structural. they look to look at pla
he used extra order nir extr extraordinary measures and stealing data and publishing it and using hi social media platforms to help sway voters. but what we don t know and now i want to put my political science professor hat on and take my ambassador hat off, to measure the independence causal influence of what the russians did against the back drop of literally dozens of variables that influence the outcome of that vote, that is a hard social science question and therefore, i can say definitively they did something. it is probably in the margins, but this election was won in the margins. 78,000 votes. and in the book you talk about u.s. and russia relations, the hot peace but perhaps seems here to stay. there is flo w there is no wa hot peace will be broken. you think this is how it will be between the u.s. and russia for ever. not for ever.