inmates from a correctal facility. good to have you with us this morning. john, start with you. there were so many who expected we would hear from the pope during that joint session, maybe someone would perceive as the more critical elements of his visit. i want to put up on the screen something he said in 2014 about incarceration and the abolishment of the death penalty, quote, all of its forms. he said in the penal code of the vatican the sanction of the life sentence is no more. should we expect something more critical than the message that most are expecting today? well, when the pope holds these meetings with the inmates, i mean, these are not policy talks. these are the pope acting as a pastor. you heard rosa talk about that
ditting? the most unusual thing is that the cia was writing the talk points. on a good sunday morning, you get policy talks. on most, you get political talks. neither of those are intelligence talks. why is the intelligence organization writing when the page is blank? the way this should happen, it is a policy side. write down what it is they want to reveal to american people and send it up river for the cia, i m going to be a little flip here, to check the spelling and the facts. al qaeda, terrorists, extremists, are all words reasonably accurate in describing what happened. each is freighted with political targ go. why do you put the intelligence organization in the role of deciding which one to use? they didn t decide t was decided by the policy and political people. how do you explain what was left out? i explained it through a very
ditting? the most unusual thing is that the cia was writing the talk points. on a good sunday morning, you get policy talks. on most, you get political talks. neither of those are intelligence talks. why is the intelligence organization writing when the page is blank? the way this should happen, it is a policy side. write down what it is they want to reveal to american people and send it up river for the cia, i m going to be a little flip here, to check the spelling and the facts. al qaeda, terrorists, extremists, are all words reasonably accurate in describing what happened. each is freighted with political targ go. why do you put the intelligence organization in the role of deciding which one to use? they didn t decide t was decided by the policy and political people. how do you explain what was left out? i explained it through a very
ditting? the most unusual thing is that the cia was writing the talk points. on a good sunday morning, you get policy talks. on most, you get political talks. neither of those are intelligence talks. why is the intelligence organization writing when the page is blank? the way this should happen, it is a policy side. write down what it is they want to reveal to american people and send it up river for the cia, i m going to be a little flip here, to check the spelling and the facts. al qaeda, terrorists, extremists, are all words reasonably accurate in describing what happened. each is freighted with political targ go. why do you put the intelligence organization in the role of deciding which one to use? they didn t decide t was decided by the policy and political people. how do you explain what was left out? i explained it through a very
policy talks, aaron. has hardened but i m why don t we start broadly as we take a look at the region, why convinced that the majority of israelis and palestinians does israel matter? would rather look to the for two basic reasons. future than be trapped in number one, they re one of the few democracies many this the past. region, and american foreign we see that spirit in the policy must reflect our values and support for like-minded israeli father whose son was societies. killed by hamas to help and the israelis, regardless of helped start an organization their policies on the west bank who brought together and gaza, the u.s./israeli israelis and palestinians who lost loved ones. relationship exists largely driven by value affinity. that father said i gradually so we have a profound and realized the only hope for important stake in the broadest progress was to recognize conception of our national the face of the conflict. interests in supporting like-minded societies. and the israel