ditting? the most unusual thing is that the cia was writing the talk points. on a good sunday morning, you get policy talks. on most, you get political talks. neither of those are intelligence talks. why is the intelligence organization writing when the page is blank? the way this should happen, it is a policy side. write down what it is they want to reveal to american people and send it up river for the cia, i m going to be a little flip here, to check the spelling and the facts. al qaeda, terrorists, extremists, are all words reasonably accurate in describing what happened. each is freighted with political targ go. why do you put the intelligence organization in the role of deciding which one to use? they didn t decide t was decided by the policy and political people. how do you explain what was left out? i explained it through a very
ditting? the most unusual thing is that the cia was writing the talk points. on a good sunday morning, you get policy talks. on most, you get political talks. neither of those are intelligence talks. why is the intelligence organization writing when the page is blank? the way this should happen, it is a policy side. write down what it is they want to reveal to american people and send it up river for the cia, i m going to be a little flip here, to check the spelling and the facts. al qaeda, terrorists, extremists, are all words reasonably accurate in describing what happened. each is freighted with political targ go. why do you put the intelligence organization in the role of deciding which one to use? they didn t decide t was decided by the policy and political people. how do you explain what was left out? i explained it through a very
ditting? the most unusual thing is that the cia was writing the talk points. on a good sunday morning, you get policy talks. on most, you get political talks. neither of those are intelligence talks. why is the intelligence organization writing when the page is blank? the way this should happen, it is a policy side. write down what it is they want to reveal to american people and send it up river for the cia, i m going to be a little flip here, to check the spelling and the facts. al qaeda, terrorists, extremists, are all words reasonably accurate in describing what happened. each is freighted with political targ go. why do you put the intelligence organization in the role of deciding which one to use? they didn t decide t was decided by the policy and political people. how do you explain what was left out? i explained it through a very