concerned, the timeline from newt to now can be called the path to polarity. it s only as it began to develop in the late 19 70s and then really crystallizing from the last ten years that polarization. i can work with you even though we have different viewpoints became tribalism, you re evil and trying to destroy our way of life. you re evil and trying to destroy our way of life? yes. they say this level of extremism is dangerous. if we don t move away from this kind of tribal identity, then the entire constitutional system is going to fail us. political tribalism isn t going anywhere any time soon. and while politicians bicker, the potholes just get bigger. roads getting better or worse? i d say getting worse. the infrastructure has gone way down. ou need. nice. but, uh. what s up with your. partner? not again. limu that s your reflection.
staffers? well, that was newt s idea. what newt did was to try and centralize the policymaking process through the speaker s office and also give great traction to those who raised more money than others. it was more about whether you are going to be loyal to the team and i m the captain and i m the one making the decisions. we asked the former speaker for comment. his office declined, citing his contract with fox. but as far as on steen is concerned, the time line from newt to now can be called the path to polarity. it is only as it began to develop in the 70s and crystallizing in the last ten years that polarization. i can work with you even though we have different viewpoints. you are evil and you are trying to destroy your way of life. you are evil and you re trying to destroy our way of life? yep. this level of extremism is dangerous. if we don t move away from
gingrich. as speaker of the house, he shut down the government twice. oh, and remember the problems caused by eliminating expert staffers? well, that was newt s idea. what newt did was to try and centralize the policymaking process through the speaker s office and also give great traction to those who raised more money than others. it was more about whether you are going to be loyal to the team and i m the captain and i m the one making the decisions. we asked the former speaker for comment. his office declined, citing his contract with fox. but as far as orenstein is concerned, the time line from newt to now can be called the path to polarity. it is only as it began to develop in the 70s and crystallizing in the last ten years that polarization. i can work with you even though we have different viewpoints. you are evil and you are trying to destroy your way of life. you are evil and you re trying to destroy our way of
it was really, really close. at the election is close again, turning new hampshire into his column could be a very big deal. jason: look at the numbers, it was exceptionally close and i think donald trump actually think they can thinks he can actually win there. jamila bey, you made the point about policy. democrats versus the g.o.p. donald trump. president trump: democrats are the party of high taxes, high crime, open borders, late-term abortion, and socialism. the republican party is the polarity of freedom. we are the party of the american worker, the american family, and the american dream and i m fighting for you each and every day. jason: i watched that and i think donald trump is actually running on issues and things are
film. it was considered a risky thing. it s an action film. but people assume because it s animated that it s a certain kind of film. that tells me that the medium needs to bust out a little bit more. the characters are real and accessib accessible. i think that was new. it was the polarity of what s mundane and what s heroic being slammed up against each other. which exit? traction avenue. that will take me downtown. don t take seven. pixar is the best because they will dare to be really real. look at the opening of up. it s a beautifully poetic sequence and sets the table for the movie to come. it begins cheerfully.