changing because that s how the culture has gone base of their party, and young people. i say this as someone in favor of same-sex marriage. it s a bit much for them to peddle this position as though it s been a long held belief which isn t true. your point tucker an important one. it s something we get into this our book. for america to co exist and live in an open minded culture, we have to stop assuming the worst about one another s motives. we re not doing that. that s been a big problem on both sides of the debate. you have some people on the antigay rights that say gay people are trying to change our culture with perversion, impact the children many in some way wa. you have people that are hateful and say they re big gots. we re not going to make progress and come together as a country
what the just did there. when he says we he s using the royal we and talking about himself, his credibility, what he has said, he wants to pretend he s been consistent all along. he s talking about what he said about syria as if he s talking about finishing a model airplane or something, it can sit on your desk and nothing will change until you come back to it. the standard he set up in libya, we can t stand by while people are being slaughtered. red lines delayed are red lines denied in a certain sense. just ask the germans. at the end of the day, the standards that he has set for himself, in terms of libya and all the rest have boiled down to him basically saying, let the slaughter continue. i m not saying we should go in now. i actually think circumstances have changed to a point tucker s argument has more weight in that it s less obviously in our interest now than it might have been a year ago when we actually could have had a better impact. what about the credibility
it is public publicity and he is drinking it up. it is like the whole candidacy thing. it started out as a publicity thing and turned into the real deal. it started out that he wanted attention and now he brainwashed himself. fine. if he is buying his own hide he is a monster. but the point tucker makes, if all trump is doing is asking a question stop with that. i know, i know. but he can t lose. that s what i m saying. i can t look at you. i can t look at you either. you can t lose by asking a simple question. he has lost my heart. i m kidding, i don t have a heart. lori, you said assange is a hipocrite and i basically agree, but i think there is an argument to be made and that s the argument makes that
there s no doubt in my mind that the president knows what he s doing. you make an interesting point tucker. alter is a total suck-up to the obama white house, total. so lanny he s describing, if you look at some of the other details aboutwr? lawrence summe, the president, rahm rahmbo and him going rogue and peter orszag and other things, he s describing a white house that is in total chaos. he doesn t seem to have the ability has the ability to read a teleprompter, stay on message run a good campaign, he bamboozled a lot of people. he doesn t seem to have the ability to manage the government. is that problemmatic for him in the end? no, the president is doing great. health care, economy bouncing back and rahm emanuel deserves a lot of credit. i can t believe we are spending time with two thoughtful conservatives about this topic. sean: i spend a lot of time
tampon out and tell me what you have to say it wasn t just the little people getting it. even former president clinton was the recipient of a tirade on the campaign trail. rahm ordered him to stop acting like the f -ing hacking chief. joining me lanny davis. hey sean. sean: is that the rahmbo that you know? that s the f -ing rahmbo i know. sean: honest answer, thank you no for once. i appreciate the honesty. i was with rahm in the white house. we had our ups and downs. let me tell you something. he s effective. he us back the house of representatives. sean: i don t want to hear that. great job as chief of staff, but he s tough. sean: what if i said to somebody, tucker, any talk