accept the right of government bureaucrats to poke around in our private parts because we are wedded to the pro tense that all seven billion people on this planet are an equal security threat to the united states of america that is a ludricrous proposition and a tragedy that civil libertarians, particularly somebody like lanny davis pointed to the civil libertarian oversight board, a couple of years ago, particularly said when somebody as distinguished as lanny davis is not concerned that the right of bureaucrats poking around in our underwear for no good reason. thank you, mark i appreciate that. i grant you if you are uncomfortable, you are entitled. i erred when i was on that board and given access to the surveillance programs and counterterrorism measures there were a lot of liberals who wanted to abolish those.
some believe the procedures go too far after looking at some of these photographs. joining me lanny davis and international best selling office mark stein is here. you are filling in for rush today and tomorrow, too? that s right. sean: somebody told me you said what was hannity saying? you why talking about the professionalization of these guys yesterday. sean: my experience has been they are professionals, following orders. that s what you don t want in this situation. they are following what they call to use the head guy i saw at the airport yesterday, standard procedure. sean: they are supposed to quit their jobs? they would be better off using human judgment. the next time something happens it will be because everybody was brain dead and followed standard procedure in the same way that thousands died on september 11,th because everybody followed
everything that was metal and forced to be body searched. i said to one of the security people, do you know who this is? this is patrick moynihan. he said what mark said, standard operating procedure there. is a point of sean: when they grope, fondle, grab the crouch of your wife and kids, tell me you feel the same way? i ll wait for that to happen and i ll probably tell you i don t like it. sean: checkmate. it took the entire segment. give me liberty or give me a grope! that s what it has come to. sean: mark good to see you, lanny, thank you. plenty more hannity straight ahead. do the things that will get our country going again. sean: republicans on the rise. karl rove has a warning for the gop. your member was not corrupt. sean: congressman rangel found guilty of ethics
the scrutiny and my inconvenience sean: lanny answer the question for crying out loud! the answer is you do both because security makes me feel safer and most americans safer. with due respect to mr. stein, i m glad people are being intruded upon because i feel safer flying because of that. that sounds pretty conservative. most liberals would say there s an invasion of privacy rights. for me feeling security is more important than somebody patting me down. this is the insanity. lanny davis is worried about appearing politically incorrect. he would rather government bureaucrats have their hands down the underwear of 300 million law abiding americans this is absurd. you have a great nation here and you are groping yourself over the cliff into oblivion. sean: that s a great line. we are giving up our rights, people are going down our under pants, they are groping
it is a tragedy that we now accept the right of government bureaucrats to poke around in our private parts because we are wedded to the pro tense that all seven billion people on this planet are an equal security threat to the united states of america that is a ludricrous proposition and a tragedy that civil libertarians, particularly somebody like lanny davis pointed to the civil libertarian oversight board, a couple of years ago, particularly said when somebody as distinguished as lanny davis is not concerned that the right of bureaucrats poking around in our underwear for no good reason. thank you, mark i appreciate that. i grant you if you are uncomfortable, you are entitled. i erred when i was on that board and given access to the surveillance programs and counterterrorism measures there were a lot of liberals who wanted to abolish those.