and trying to get away with election crimes to help trump, criminal election subversion is now being celebrated and ece rewarded even in places where criminal prosecutions of these o folks are ongoing.on places like arizona and nevada. fake trump electors are charged with felonies there, but the accused felons have also just been given big new jobs by the state republican party in those states. they ve been named delegates to the national republican convention and state representatives to the ve republican national committee. they ve done the same with one of the fake electors in wisconsin where republicans are trying again to recall a state h legislative leader who acted, in their mind, with insufficient , fervor to overthrow the election results in wisconsin when biden won that state and trump lost. i mean in nevada, two of the state s official electors for the 2024 election will be people who are currently under indictment for what they did as fake electors in the last election. in
In Memoriam: Spectrum Sound Co-Founder Bev Porter, 1956-2023 – FOH fohonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from fohonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
just a cooling-off period to wipe away this saturda deadline, if you will you might see that stay as soo as tomorrow. okay. let s unpack the ruling in the fifth circuit. yeah. because the anti choice movement is claiming this as a victory. i think some people might say, well, mifepristone is stil available. isn t that actually a victor for people who are advocates o choice it seems like once you actuall get down to brass tacks, it is not a good ruling at all on lot of - for a number of reasons, for people who are advocates o folks having reproductiv choice the language in the opinion is striking, especially as i relates to standing, which i the legal right to sue i court. and on that score, the fifth circuit panel to trump appointees and th george w. bush appointee - pound for pound are in the plaintiffs camp here and remember, this case is brought by advocacy groups and for doctors. it is not brought by women who say they were armed by mifepristone it s not even brought by
well, mifepristone is stil available. isn t that actually a victor for people who are advocates o choice it seems like once you actuall get down to brass tacks, it is not a good ruling at all on lot of - for a number of reasons, for people who are advocates o folks having reproductiv choice the language in the opinion is striking, especially as i relates to standing, which i the legal right to sue i court. and on that score, the fifth circuit panel to trump appointees and th george w. bush appointee - pound for pound are in the plaintiffs camp here and remember, this case is brought by advocacy groups and for doctors. it is not brought by women who say they were armed by mifepristone it s not even brought by doctors who say they prescribe mifepristone it s brought by doctors who sa they when they were in the emergency room, they cam across women who had bad effects, and therefore, in the future, they may somewhere a some point, encounter some woman who theoretically - and so