who are you really talkin about? is there someone else that w know like that i m just asking. maybe if he had a restaurant, he would put up classified folders in his restaurant or show them where the nuclear ma is maybe there s nuclear maps, man. nobody gets to be promptin like a nuclear map chris, thank you thank you as always, my friend and thanks to at-home fo joining us this evening. donald trump s questionable fundraising tactics are no exactly a new thing. and i made it that it broke. after all, he s turned his manhattan indictment into moneymaking juggernaut to the tune of $12 million plus looks like he turned his las days in office into a cash bonanza while at the same time trying to subvert democracy. it was pretty ambitious. i mean, some people might just try to steal an election and leave it there but not donald trump the second of january 6t hearing in congress back i june representative low zo lofgren she called it the president trump used the lie he
otherwise? yeah. it s made us a lot closer. every time i signed to him, see a smile on his face. after high school, surely i planning on becoming an as interpreter. for example, i m going to the store. so, how would you sign that i go to store and she s already getting started. i just feel there should be a lot more - out there for people like my brother. it s a sign of what to come rehema ellis, nbc news, ne york thank you to the grea rehema ellis and on that note, i wish you a very good night. from all of our colleagues across the network networks of nbc news, anthks for staying u late i will see you at the end of tomorrow donald trump s questionable fundraising tactics are no exactly a new thing. and i mean if it ain t broke - after all, he s turned his manhattan indictment into moneymaking juggernaut to the tune of $12 million plus just like he turned his last days in office into a cash bonanza while at the same time trying to subvert democracy. it was
mifepristone, which is three weeks less than before and again, that s before som people - may be many people - know they are even pregnant. earlier today, the justice department promised to take th fight over it mifepristone all the way to the supreme court but unless the court weighs in soon, it s thursday, these major restrictions on abortion medications will go into effec as this friday - as in tomorrow - turns to saturday. in the meantime, a different federal judge in washingto state today is telling the fda to do exactly the opposite o all of this, reiterating a order he issued last week th judge told the fda to make absolutely no changes to the availability of mifepristone at least in the 17 state involved in the lawsuit before his court so, what is the fda do with al this and when should we expec scotus to weigh in joining us now is the person with all of the answers. nbc news senior lega correspondent, laura jarrett laura, i need you in this hour first help me understand wha
just a cooling-off period to wipe away this saturda deadline, if you will you might see that stay as soo as tomorrow. okay. let s unpack the ruling in the fifth circuit. yeah. because the anti choice movement is claiming this as a victory. i think some people might say, well, mifepristone is stil available. isn t that actually a victor for people who are advocates o choice it seems like once you actuall get down to brass tacks, it is not a good ruling at all on lot of - for a number of reasons, for people who are advocates o folks having reproductiv choice the language in the opinion is striking, especially as i relates to standing, which i the legal right to sue i court. and on that score, the fifth circuit panel to trump appointees and th george w. bush appointee - pound for pound are in the plaintiffs camp here and remember, this case is brought by advocacy groups and for doctors. it is not brought by women who say they were armed by mifepristone it s not even brought by
mifepristone it s brought by doctors who sa they when they were in the emergency room, they cam across women who had bad effects, and therefore, in the future, they may somewhere a some point, encounter some woman who theoretically - and so that, typically, i seen as quite speculative, and not enough to get into federal court. instead, the fifth circuit has had, that s just fine. and that s a view of standin that perhaps - they don t know, perhaps - perhaps the supreme court ma decide it does not work fo them but we don t know. you are looking at m skeptically because we know how the court is - we know how the court has ruled on abortion and wher they stand ideologically let s just say it sure but there are a lot of reasons jurisprudence wise, this might bother them. absolutely. because this is preceden setting. setting aside the issue of abortion, what is bein proposed here legally is reall out of the ordinary and for th fifth circuit not to just toss this out on standin