in for harris today on the faulkner focus. john roberts writing in the majority opinion, this court has never drawn the line the secretary suggests and for good reason. among congress s most important authorities is its control of the purse. justice kagan with dissent writing the majority overrides the combined judgment of the legislative and executive branches with the consequence of eliminating loan forgiveness for 43 million americans. i respectfully dissent from that decision. white house says we ll hear from the president directly on this ruling later today. in the meantime let s bring in shannon bream, fox news chief legal correspondent. a lot of political back and forthing now in washington responding to this decision but at the end of the day as you pointed out last hour, the court was not ruling on whether this was a good policy or fair policy. the court was ruling on whether the president had the constitutional authority to issue this directive in the first place.
his authority. but the big guy says this fight isn t over. you know, these republican officials just couldn t bear the thought of providing relief of working-class and middle-class americans. we won t stop fighting for you. we will use every tool at our disposal to get you the student debt relief you need and reach your dreams beard why did you give millions of borrowers false hope? i did not give false hope come up with republicans snatched away the whole they were given, and it is real, real hope. overstep your authority? i think the court misinterpreted the constitution. joey: but maybe biden should save some of that anger for nancy pelosi. the supreme court actually using the former speaker s own words in the ruling. people think that the president of the united states has the power for debt forgiveness. he does not. he can postpone, he can delay, but he does not have that power. that has to be an act of congress. joey: yeah, as you can imagine, the media
she brought charges against trump and 18 others in georgia. now fani willis has some serious questions of her own to answer. tonight on laura coates live. the election subversion case against trump in georgia is a sprawling one. it involves more than a dozen co-defendants, some of trump s closest allies and sweeping racketeering charges otherwise known as rico. you ve all heard people talk about it. now a new let s call it a wrinkle for a second could make this case a whole lot messier. it relates to fulton county district attorney fani willis, the special prosecutor, nathan wade, she brought in and whether there s some big conflict of interest that would affect the underlying charges. wade s estranged wife is alleging willis had an affair with her husband and she says she s got receipts to back it up. now there are new records released in the divorce proceedings, including copies of credit card statements that show wade purchased airline tickets for himself and for willis,
await today s opinion. shannon bream is standing by outside the court. hi, shannon. this is it, dana and bill. we re down to the wire. we know the student loan cases are coming today and know the case on the colorado web designer the free speech issue is coming today as well. the question continues to be does it punted get to an issue of standing. they talked about whether these parties, the group of states, red states that brought the case and borrowers who brought a separate case that they joined together at the court, do they either one of them have the right legal posture to be the ones to have the case heard? it was a lot of doubt. not just the left leaning justices. do they get to the merits of the case? i feel like because they ve held it to the last day my gut says they should have gotten to the merits. they ve taken a long time. we would expect they do. we ll know within moments. the first case it looks like that we have is the colorado web designer. the web design