department recalled her two months, threarly from her post. at the time, the word out of foggy bottom is this was as planned. the countries does have a history with corruption and these problems. what you saw is a reaction on capitol hill and among other diplomats, sort of confusion, so to speak over why she would be taken out. do you have any sense as to why she was allowed to give her deposition? she is, as you outlined in other reports, central in all of this because she, i guess, begins the entire ukraine story for us, if you want to use that as a central plot point. why was she ultimately allowed to appear today in congress? why did we not get a sense that the white house or state department wanted to block her testimony? it is a little bit of an open question right now. when you look at somebody she was at the center of all of this. she was at the center of rudy
treatment. that s a more relevant plot point than race. america s government idea of treatment is the streets. the saturday night massacre won t lead the news because the homeless are not the prettiest victims and the perp is not a mustache twirling villian. the most desperate are left to suffer until they turn on themselves. it s no story from d.c. comics. but the other d.c. a reality born from abdicating responsibilities by the bureaucracy. which is why the mayor and the media prefer the comic book. there was an article that reported 76% of the homeless in l.a. county are afflicted by mental illness and it s
and today we started to come around to what might be the punchline of this story. what may be sort of the culminating plot point in some of this strange and seemingly troubling relationship between the president and this very, very deeply screwed up bank. some of the key documents we want are analyses by the banks. remember, you have a situation where mr. trump is going to deutsche bank asking for very large loans when no other bank apparently will touch him. and so what for obvious reasons both committees here want to know, why is it that deutsche bank would be willing to lend a large amount of money to somebody that no other bank would touch way before he is president of the united states? douglas ledder is a famous guy. he is the afoernt u.s. house. and that was him arguing on
around to what might be the punch line of this story. what may be sort of the culminating plot point in some of this strange and seemingly troubling relationship between the president and this very, very deeply screwed up bank. some of the key documents we want are analyses by the banks. remember, you have a situation where mr. trump is going to deutsche bank asking for very large loans when no other bank apparently will touch him. and so what for obvious reasons both committees here want to know, why is it that deutsche bank would be willing to lend a large amount of money to somebody that no other bank would touch way before he is president of the united states? okay. so that is douglas letter. we had his name misspelled on that cue card. it s l-e-t-t-e-r, not
comedy is going to be the new rock n roll. all right. listen up, i don t like white people, i hate red necks, you people are red necks. that means i m enjoying this shit. you got to remember when eddie murphy first started with 48 hours, he was 20 years old. then he does trading places. then he does the blockbuster beverly hills cop. eddie murphy in the 80s was comedy. he s the perfect every man and he s likeable even though he s kind of a shit. it wasn t about necessarily being the put-upon guy, it s being the guy smarter in the room. he s bugs bunny. you know, this is the cleanest and nicest police car i ve ever been in in my life. this thing s nicer than my apartment. up until that point, hollywood movies that featured or starred a black artist, their color was always a plot point. in coming to america, their color has nothing to do with the plot.