between empty platitude and science. science, the left loves that word until the left doesn t benefit their platitude. don t say gay bill, that is platitude, thatten moos not putting sex in classrooms. beloved science, dr. fauci, where are you? i did research for your show, national institute of health on their website, a journal article says the former male physiology of trans women athletes provides them with physiological advantage. if you are taking hormones, the testosterone during puberty affects you differently. my favorite take, megan rapinoe. david axelrod, she would be interesting politician someday if so inclined. i don t know if i would rather
been the folks bringing this litigation or at least behind it because it s not an accident when parties before the supreme court or when groups litigating before the supreme court choose their plaintiffs or choose the folks bringing suits, very deliberately. and i think that was the case here and setting up a bit of a whether you want to call it tension or opposition, whatever term you wish to use, between asian students and black students was i think quite deliberate and powerful to see. it is still a person of color, a person of a minority group, however want to define it. one other point i would make about today and i think the term or the expression elections have consequences is a little bit of a platitude. are you seeing the greatest success by all means of donald trump and his presidency and working with the senate leadership, particularly mitch mcconnell, over the period of those years. this was sort of both between
confront china over-the-counter intelligence and espionage efforts against the u.s., the question is how and will he do it. let s bring in retired lieutenant general keith kellogg, former national security adviser to mike pence and fox news contributor. what if anything can he accomplish here. any deliverables? no. john: thanks, nice having you here. harsh assessment, i understand that. but we are looking at two nations like two ships passing in the night. the chinese have a goal, and it s provocation and power generation, and we respond with platitude. look at everything from the spy balloon incident, to what the chinese ships did in the taiwan strait, when you look at the buzzing of the reconnaissance jet, the secretary austin was snubbed by their secretary of defense li and then you have secretary blinken going over there and even president biden said there s no really goals out there for him to accomplish out
for when impartiality might be called into question of the attorney general or the justice department, and it serves the public interest to have somebody else outside the chain of command of justice department leadership, run an investigation. that s what s happened here and that s what attorney general was trying to affirm in that answer. he s saying any questions you have will be answered by the filings in court. they are pretty extensive. yeah. they have really showed their hand, the special counsel has, in the indictment. look, i worked at the justice department for six years, four of them as a political appointee. that s kind of a platitude and nothing precludes either jack smith or the attorney general from making statements on the record about the indictment. the problem is the moment they open their mouth and start talking about facts and getting into the details, they open themselves up to attack. and that s exactly the right thing to say is, you know, take a look at
charged with obstructing justice and with taking classified documents, national security documents out of the white house and preventing them from being returned. it s the exact same thought i had when he said that, that it s actually a truth. it s a dark day for the country. and it s obviously an enormous historic moment. but will be looked back as a dark day that this has happened, that it s reached this point, and that the allegations are this serious, and it s of a national security matter this large. and as we await those counts, one thing we should be looking for. you talk about a talking indictment, right, which i know we talked a lot about in the alvin bragg case in new york that would include a lot of detail, all the context. do you think we re going to get something like this? is it going to be documents? i think it might. now look, the justice department almost as a platitude said we speak through our documents, not through the words of the attorney general or jack smi