air space, if you will, could that have been literally flying under radar? well, it s a little confusing to me, wolf, because the terrain in malaysia offers up several peaks at about 7,000 feet above sea level. so if in fact he was flying at 4,000 feet above sea level, it s very likely he would have encountered what we call cumulus granite, which is what we call it in the pilot business which is a mountain. so an altitude above ground or above sea level, it s 7,000 feet, plus 4,000, which puts us at the 11,000 or 12,000, which we ve already reported. these numbers have been very confusing to me and i m told the malaysian military radar is not very accurate. what s your analysis of that, if in fact that plane went down to 4,000 or 5,000 feet, peter,
not revealing. and there s an investigation, both a criminal investigation and aeronautical investigation. and we ll find out in the fullness of time. do i think we are any closer to knowing why? no. we have a variety of circumstantial evidence. i have never seen so much one and one plus one and we ll get to it half a dozen or more if we can. this pilot business is just breathtaking. it s mind boggling the way in which journalists are just throwing every rule that we ve ever been taught from day one. whoops, out the window. now, where we are getting closers finding wreckage. in the last 48 hours, 72 hours, we ve had the japanese with their ten pieces, we ve got the thais with their 300 pieces, the french with their 122 pieces. and it s not close to each other but it s not far from each other. could it all just be wreckage out there anyway in the ocean? the ocean is full of this kind of stuff. but not at this level. i don t know. not at this level. sounds unlikely. and the experts t