knowing about, what does this cost to? oh, it s going to be just to get started, a couple hundred thousand dollars. it bankruptcy very quickly. the special prosecutors blow you up, they do this, what i call, perjury trap. it is really, they ask you a question, they have material they won t show you, you have forgotten about her, they say, you just lied because this email you forgot about in 2016 proves your current memory is wrong. i mean, it s a memory test. tucker: that was author jerome corsi. he s at 72 years old. earlier this year, the mueller investigation asking for his laptop and has gone and he complied, he voluntarily gave both for the prosecutors. they ask him about a series of questions about emails he had sent and in one case, he said he forgot that he had forwarded an email two years ago. the mueller people whipped around and accused him of perjury and directed to charge him with a felony.
oh, it s going to be just to get started a couple hundred thousand dollars. it bankrupts you very quickly. the special prosecutors blow you up, they do this, what i call a perjury trap. it is really they ask you a question, they have material they won t show you, you have forgotten about it, theyri say, you just lied because this email you forgot about in 2016 proves your current memory is wrong. i mean, it s a memory test. tucker: that was author jerome corsi. he s 72 years-old. earlier this year, the mueller investigation asked him for his laptop and his phone and he complied, he voluntarily gave both to the prosecutors. they asked him about a series of questions about emails he had sent and in one case, he said he forgot that he had forwarded an email two years ago. the mueller people whipped around and accused him of perjury and threatened to charge him with a felony.th
point, it would not be perjury. perjury has to be relevant to the case at hand and intentional. a lot of people are saying it s a perjury trap, there is no perjury trap. you intentionally lied about something that is relevant. tucker: if i got a hold of your phone and your laptop, and i say come i have every communication that you sent and received two years ago, and i will ask you questions about an email that you forwarded two years ago you are 72 years old and you don t remember the president is 74? we shouldn t be worried about the memories of 72 euros tucker: i m not attacking older people. i can t remember what emails i forwarded two years ago. is not a felony if i can t remember. if you suddenly charge a man with a felony because he can t or member forwarding an email, i don t offers a perjury trap are not but it s totally immoral. the point of this is protecting america from a foreign power. i m an attorney, okay? if you forget about an email, that is not perjur
with assange, but yet had figured out that assange had progressed as emails, i figured it out and told roger stone and told many people in august, and it just happened that i was right. the prosecutor said that we will not believe in your 25th wedding anniversary to italy with your life and family, you had divine inspiration and god told you podesta had assange s emails. i i don t know if i want to putt out crassly but i did figured out and i corrected the dots, and you just want believe i figured it out. tucker: quickly, because i can t resist asking because i think the human cost is worth knowing about, what does this cause do? it is going to be just to get started a couple hundred thousand dollars. i mean, it banked up here very quickly. and the special prosecutors blow you up, they do this what i call perjury trap, it is really they ask you a question, they have material they want to show
anything mueller s team asks him to say. listen to this. the special prosecutors blow you up, they do this what i call perjury trapped. rigged and politically driven by clinton operatives who have an agenda. if you can t give them what they re looking for to fill their narrative they blow you off and charge you with a crime. bill: what do you make of that? i disagree with it. i have to disagree with it as someone who once led the department of justice and we re talking about d.o.j. investigators and prosecutors. if that s what s going on here, i wholeheartedly condemn it but they have a job to do to get information from any potential witness. i think that s what they re trying to do here. but to intentionally set a perjury trap is something i disagree with. i think it s unfair and i think it s unprofessional. bill: we ve heard that from a lot of people involved in this. that the mueller s team? bill: the perjury trap. giuliani talks about it all the