to my house after they knew i was innocent of any dealings with the russians, they were looking for a perjury trap. that s when they went after flynn within 48 hours of going after me. from what loretta lynch testified to, it looked like we have fisa warrants issuedous. if it s true that there were fisa warrants i will lils italy issued on myself, flynn, and manafort, that s problem. why would they be ish ring a fisa warrant on me, i never traveled to russia. that is at the core of the corruption of this investigation. why i think it s paramount that the president offers any assistance he can to investigate the investigators. sean: they even turned it into a james bond novel when one of the stephon halper meetings, they brought in a flirtatious blonde bombshell character, right out of james bond. but they will they heard what you said, what a patriot you are. they heard from bruce orr,
thankfully, truth did prevail, four separate investigations to date have cleared the president and his campaign of any and all wrong doing. the hoax has been laid bare for all to see. we will give you so much more information. democrats in congress, apparently they haven t gotten the memo. jerry nadler s clown show is in full swing, never ending string of frivolous subpoenas, after failing to haul in don mcgann. nadler issued subpoenas for his chief of staff. even former aid hope hicks, currently serves as ebp at this network, here at fox. we re going to make hope hicks spend another million dollars on lawyers to answer the same exact questions again? only this time it will be a perjury trap, god forbid anyone that goes before congress, they have one minor detail, one little discrepancy. that s wrong or different from the last time they testified. it s called a perjury trap. the attorney general, barr,
date have cleared the president and his campaign of any and all wrongdoing. the hoax has been laid bare for all to see. we will give you so much more information. democrats in congress, apparently they haven t gotten the memo. jerry nadler s clown show is in full swing, never ending string of frivolous subpoenas, after failing to haul in don mcgahn. then nadler issued subpoenas for his chief of staff. even former aide hope hicks, currently serves as ebp at this network, here at fox. we re going to make hope hicks spend another million dollars on lawyers to answer the same exact questions again? only this time it will be a perjury trap. god forbid anyone that goes before congress, they have one minor detail, one little discrepancy, that s wrong or different from the last time they testified. it s called a perjury trap. the attorney general, barr, defied a request to appear before nadler s circus.
we love, mr. trump loves america, i love america, we have nothing to do with what you re talking about. sean: let s assume that the transcripts xils the and that hannity for the last two years has pretty good sources as has all of this ensemble team we bring on this show every night. that would mean that if they taped you and they transcripts of you, and you just said everything you just said, then when you finally were brought in you were walking right into a perjury trap if you did not remember perfectly that which they knew you said. does that sound like it to you? i think that s exactly what happened. i ve never met a russian official in my life. i worked at neoconservative think tank in d.c. then in the energy business throughout my professional career. as an american, the last thing you are doing is promoting russian interest. so you re right, when they came
of exculpatory evidence, andrew weissmann licensed to lie sydney poum said he withheld exculpatory evidence, why was he hired, why was he on that team. bruce orr warning everybody. the state department warning everybody. then we have tapes for papadopoulos and page, was that a perjury trap? they knew what he said, they spied on him, they set that kid up and he said exculpatory things. no doubt it was a perjury trap. whenever the government knows what you re going to say and calls new fronted of the grand jury to see if you say anything contradictory to that, that s the classic perjury trap. you can fall into a perjury trap even if you re totally innocent. if the government chooses to believe somebody e78s s truth, somebody who s a bought with it or rented with it, who testifies contradictory to what you have said under oath that s a perjury trap. more important what your previous guest said, this idea