lieutenant general michael flynn, 33 years of service, he was not spared either. the combat that fell victim to bought was a perjury trap. mccabe, comey bragging about it. he and members of his family were threatened with significant prison time. his screws were turned in the hopes that he would sing or compose as judge ellis one side and in the process mounting legal bills wrecked his family finances. he had to sell his house, he ultimately agreed to plead guilty to lie to the fbi and the fbi did not think he lied. he did it to save his family and is on a particular. tonight thanks to investigative reporter sara carter, we are learning some damning new information about flynn s plea deal and according to the level counsel, the ever so powerful and smart cindy powell, persecutors wanted flynn to lie under oath against the former business partner in a case surrounding again a fara
cooperate with yet a fifth investigation. private americans, they are legal fees, they are spiraling out of control, all because of an outright smear campaign from the democrats. they never accepted the election loss in 2016. they are not accepting now five separate conclusions, no collusion. that is government harassment. that is government abuse of power plain and simple. i would urge these people, you ve already testified, you can t add to what you testified to before, you are only walking into a perjury trap. maybe the fifth amendment should be considered. keep in mind, the house judiciary committee is supposed to perform oversight of the department of justice. so where is their investigation into the fisa abuse? what about their investigation into political bias in the mueller probe? is their investigation into a list of government spying, using the powerful tools of intelligence against the american people, especially at the height of an election favoring one candidate over anoth
private americans, their legal fees, they are spiraling out of control, all because of an outright smear campaign from the democrats. they never accepted the election loss in 2016. they are not accepting now five separate conclusions, no collusion. that is government harassment. that is government abuse of power, plain and simple.t i would urge these people, you ve already testified, you can t add to what you testified to before, you are only walking into a perjury trap. maybe the fifth amendment should be considered. keep in mind, the house judiciary committee is supposed to perform oversight of the department of justice. so where is their investigation into the fisa abuse? what about their investigation into political bias in the mueller probe? is there an investigation into a list of government spying, usins the powerful tools of intelligence against the american people, especially at the height of an election favoring one candidate over another? did they even care if high-ranking b
anymore-up in what trump associates refer to as a perjury trap. if you answer these questions to me now why not answer them to robert mueller under oath? because they were looking to get us for lies, for slight misstatements. i looked at what happened to people and it was very unfair. you didn t answer questions on obstruction? wait a minute. i did answer questions. i answered them in writing. not on obstruction. i don t know, i answered a lot of questions. they gave me questions. i answered them in writing. not on obstruction. look, george, you re being a little wise guy. okay? which is typical for you. just so you understand. very simple. it is very simple. there was no crime. there was no collusion. house democrats want to hear from mcgahn and mueller for that matter in person before the judiciary committee, which will hold its second hearing on the mueller report next thursday. democrats were handed something of a setback today in their oversight efforts. we ll ex
perjury trap. if you answer these questions to me now why not answer them to robert mueller under oath? because they were looking to get us for lies, for slight misstatements. i looked at what happened to people and it was very unfair. you didn t answer questions on obstruction? wait a minute. i did answer questions. i answered them in writing. i answered a lot of questions. they gave me questions. i answered them in writing. not on obstruction. look, george, you re being a little wise guy. okay? which is typical for you. just so you understand. very simple. it is very simple. there was no crime. there was no collusion. house democrats want to hear from mcgahn and mueller for that matter in person before the judiciary committee, which will hold its second hearing on the mueller report next thursday. democrats were handed something of a setback today in their oversight efforts. we ll explain this. the justice department today said the treasury department doesn t have to gi