produce any other thing in its custody or under his control, and the test of relation to the inquiry is not in that part of the act, so you could probablyjust get the phone itself even if there are problems with getting the. the roblem problems with getting the. the problem is problems with getting the. the problem is what is deemed to be relevant material and one would assume the chair of that inquiry is the person who should deem whether it is relevant or not? yes. the person who should deem whether it is relevant or not? it is relevant or not? yes, and as to the privacy it is relevant or not? yes, and as to the privacy argument - it is relevant or not? yes, and as to the privacy argument that - it is relevant or not? yes, and as to the privacy argument that we | to the privacy argument that we need to the privacy argument that we need to remember, this is not a question of making all the document available to the public immediately but there is a filtering process. it goes to t
that money around. in this case, you know, causes a lot of concerns. shouldn t we know more about who leonard leo is and how he has changed america? so 10-year-old girls who are raped in ohio have to flee the state, because they may not be able to get abortions in their own home states? right. so we should have more robust disclosure. a point missing from some of this discussion. we talked a lot about what the technical moves require. you know? what must the justices disclose. but what that misses, joe, dramatic pause, is, there s a perception issue. we ve woo lost confidence in all of our institutions, in academia, in the courts, in congress, in the presidency. in corporate america. and so you have to be worried about two things. whether or not something is fair, just, appropriate, proper,
are being made. that is that the governor s code puts the application of disclosure on the candidates, in this case richard sharpe, not on others. it is for candidates to make their own judgment. others. it is for candidates to make their ownjudgment. that others. it is for candidates to make their own judgment. that is others. it is for candidates to make their ownjudgment. that is key because what it essentially says his richard sharpe was under that obligation to report any potential perception of conflict of interest, which the report finds he did not. the report does say it is really about the risks that richard sharpe was not seen as independent of the prime minister at the time, boris johnson. it is about the perception issue. the report does not make any specific conclusions, as you can see here, about his actual culpability or perceived culpability. the report does say that it does not really judge his independence in this matter, it is about the perception and the disclosure
take pause those are very important reasons to take pause and step aside. i honestly take pause and step aside. i honestly wish that we had people here in honestly wish that we had people here in the united states who would make here in the united states who would make similar decisions when there is the semblance of impropriety. a the semblance of impropriety. perception issue here ameshia cross because of the foreign crisp correspondent working in the bbc. he remember the huge row when elon musk labelled it bbc as a government funded broadcaster, we are a publicly funded broadcaster and that distinction is crucially important when you re working in a company like egypt, where i work, if you are seen as a public government ruckus as opposed to the public and that his wife as a people had problem with the perception. does that come across? it problem with the perception. does that come across? that come across? it came across ure and that come across? it came across pure and
a member of a protected class. what do you think about the white house doing this on the day where they announce his reelection? for the next 18 months there is going to be a lot of box checking going on. this is the number one box he could have changed when he had the house, but it is all about guns. in one of the articles, democrats were saying they are caught in a spiral in which perceptions of rising crime lead more people to buy more firearms. crime is rising. people are not being arrested, prosecuted, convicted. they are not being locked up at all. they are saying we have this perception issue and crime is not up. if you think you need are done,