seen it, it s been creeping in increments. beloved characters of childhood. the adult values are being imposed. there was a winnie the pooh movie that just came out not long ago where winnie the pooh and piglet are serial killers. winnie the pooh entered public domain. he s a serial killer with piglet. the horror of all of it, people who didn t create these characters are manipulating them and maiming them in the public imagination. that s my biggest objection. if they wanted to get to the history of velma, the new york times says she is canonically a lesbian. she was created office spin-off. laura: i never was into scooby doo. it s a boy s cartoon. i don t think girls we are not allowed to say that anymore. i liked it.
guarded. but what you and your team are reporting is also it wasn t tightly guarded at the white house either. that s right. we have talked to former officials who served at senior levels in the intelligence community in the trump administration who said that it was routine that highly classified information was passed around and handled by people who did not have the need to possess it or to read it. people who did not have the appropriate security clearances, people who didn t have a need to know, that among this information one former intelligence official told us they routinely saw signals intelligence, things like intercepted communications potentially of foreign leaders. that, too, is some of the most closely protected and guarded information and the idea that it was flowing around freely among officials who didn t need to have it or didn t have the proper access to it starts to fill out a picture of just the kind of sloppiness that many former officials say they saw in the tru
to weaponize the government to come after them. and that at that point, it is going to be time to fight. and, listen, this is not this isn t just some tiny fringe faction that is discussing this holdup in a compound somewhere. go to a major gun show anywhere in america, i was just at the miami-dade gun show a few weeks ago talking to people about this. when you have when you re watching hundreds and hundreds of people buying body armor, walking out of there with kevlar vests, there were a couple of guys trying to buy a flame thrower, you ask yourself why did they need that stuff? i go he tto gun ranges all the . i ve never been around anybody who needed full body armor, the type of thing you need to execute some sort of a s.w.a.t. team raid. why would you need that? ask yourself that question. it is not hard to figure out. and, again, i think by not acknowledging this, and by not acknowledging the risks that are
decision does, it allows people through their state legislatures or through ballot initiatives to establish what abortion law will be. howard: the high court in 1973 found it was constitutional at the time, and that brings me to the culmination of a half century effort by the pro-life movement to sop what its members view as stop what its members view as killing babies. but you re not going to see glowing profiles of the movement as happened when the court legalized same-sex marriage. right. and there were so many people who worked so hard. there were people who didn t even sur live to see this day survive. it was the conservative judicial movement, christians, catholics and other religious people, human rights advocates who opposed the violence of abortion. this is a wonderfully successful story. but the way that you see it framed in most major corporate media is as something that is reflecting their own personal leftist bias. howard: well, leslie, for hose who believe deeply in
was the case, and are let me expand why the president thought this and what brought him to this conclusion and at least get president trump s point of view on it. howard: yeah. you have anti-trumpers, people who didn t agree on now live testimony and edited testimony out there. if you do an interview, howie, and you only pick out 6 minutes, obviously, those 6 minutes help tell your story. what about the rest? that would have been what the other side would have done. howard: you know who agrees with you, brian, is former president trump who has said publicly a couple times now that kevin mccarthy made a foolish mistake in pulling all his members. people remember nancy pelosi rejected some of his nominees, but i guess even the heavy media coverage, the thinking now among some republicans is it would have been better to have a defender or two or three on that panel. laura, on this question of we re only getting one side of the story, i m tug struck that most conservative pundits at or