where she includes alvin bragg s name alvin bragg insists that the district attorney s office has not waived privilege on any of the material that mark pomerantz might be questio about, including material that is in the book that mark pomerantz unwisely and recklessly published about his service as an assistan district attorney investigatin donald trump with the titl people versus donald trump and an inside account. the judge insists that the district attorney office has waive privilege because it did not seek to have this book banned when simon & schuster was publishing it. this judge apparently has no comprehension of the constitutional inability of th district attorney to get a boo banned before publication. the judge finds fault with alvin bragg s legal position because alvin bragg did no take the constitutionall impossible position of tryin
where she includes alvin bragg s name alvin bragg insists that the district attorney s office has not waived privilege on any of the material that mark pomerantz might be questio about, including material that is in the book that mark pomerantz unwisely and recklessly published about his service as an assistan district attorney investigatin donald trump with the titl people versus donald trump and an inside account. constitutional inability of th district attorney to get a boo banned before publication. the judge finds fault with alvin bragg s legal position because alvin bragg did no take the constitutionall impossible position of tryin to ban a book.
debate as with so many things in america of people who want to lie their way through this or claim that accountability is a prosecution. those claims will be tested in court. if a judge finds or a jury perceives this d.a. or this process has been politicized and it s not about the evidence, i think it would blow up in their face that s why we have an adversarial process. the burden is on the d.a. s office, not the defendant. those things have to be tested in court not at mypillow.com or any place that recycles conspiracy theories. one more thing, katy, as we reflect on this i just looked at the filing, the people versus donald trump, defendant, we lived through an insurrection. we lived through an effort to overthrow democracy. the investigation in that case is open and ongoing. we re living through the normalizing of that.
statement investigation, colonel investigation that we were doing. there are no new facts that can appear in the attorney general s complaint. i was pretty well satisfied when i wrote the book, that i wasn t going to interfere with any potential prosecution. look, i wrote the book, in part, to say there should have been a criminal prosecution. there needs to be a criminal prosecution. the last thing i would ve done is to do something that would ve get in the way of a criminal prosecution. that i think should still be brought. and there might yet be one, i ve much more to ask you, please stay right there, i guess as mark pomerantsev and show last year a lot blood in both the gauge and former president donald trump, the new york da s office, his new book about his time there is it called the people versus donald trump. it s not tonight at midnight, we ll be back, stay with us. l be back, stay with us.
Through her unique approach to storytelling, Rachel Maddow provides in-depth reporting to illuminate the current state of political affairs and reveals the.