jordan obtaining testimony fro a former prosecutor who worked for alvin bragg. that became a pretty hotly argued motion today in federal court. the judge ruled very quickly so quickly that it s very clea that the opinion was written before the argument took place also later, in the hour, mor importantly merrick s gonn join us, the attorne representing ralph yarl, the 1 year old shot twice for ringin the wrong doorbell and o course as you know, ralph is a home, under the care of hi mother, who is a nurse, so the first thing will find out is how ralph is doing, and then we ll find out more about th status of that case. those are really importan voices on a night like this, lawrence sounds like a good joe thank you today a trump appointed federal judge in manhattan deciding whether to block subpoena by jim jordan to former prosecutor in manhattan district attorney alvin bragg office, and in that case the trump judge accused one of the sides in the case of engagin in what
often talk about what happening with the question of jim jordan obtaining testimony from a former prosecutor who worked for alvin bragg that became a pretty hotly argued motion today in federal court. the judge ruled very quickly so quickly that it s very clea that the opinion was written before the argument took place also later in the hour, more important, lee merritt is gonn join us, the attorne representing ralph yarl, the 1 year old shot twice for ringin the wrong doorbell and o course as you know, ralph is a home, under the care of hi mother, who is a nurse, so the first thing will find out is how ralph is doing, and then we ll find out more about th status of that case. those are really importan voices on a night like this, lawrence sounds like a good show. thank you, alex goodnight today, a trump appointe federal judge in manhattan deciding whether to block subpoena by jim jordan to former prosecutor in manhattan district attorney alvin bragg office, and in
the day mark pomerantz s boo came out and alvin bragg would not have gone into the trump prosecutio without a thorough plan of how to handle the pomerant problem. as he prosecutes donald trump. leading off our discussion tonight, is democratic congressman adam schiff of california he served on the january six committee and is currently a candid of united states and in california also under weisman, former fbi general counsel and former chief of the criminal division of the eastern district of new york congressman schiff, so it look like it s very likely that mar pomerantz will end up doin some kind of deposition for ji jordan so what are you expecting from him i m not quite sure whethe he will refuse to answer all questions or just some questions but i share th skepticism of this opinion judges bridal it being described as appointed by this
the merits at all. it s not terribly unreasonable especially after mark pomerant published this book. the judge loves mark pomerantz s book so much tha she quotes it at great lengt in her opinion and in detail and she shockingly distorts it in don trump s favor the judge falsely presents thi from mark pomerantz s book ultimately in march 2023 bragged it, of course, indic president trump, bringing th zombie theory back from th dead once again. notice that bracket, changin the chance of that word. there is a federal judge in written opinion, clearly attributing to mark pomerant on page 209 of this book, statement about what alvin bragg did in march of 2023
condition, but also the phon invoices for legal service that had been used to reimburs michael cohen for the mone that he had paid to stephani clifford so there is mark pomerantz himself. alvin bragg s greatest criti before donald trump starte attacking alvin bragg. there himself advocating be very prosecution that alvin bragg has undertaken and that is a completely different version in that book of what the federal judge so prejudicially slices out o those lines and reshapes the words by cutting off pieces of the words and substituting the with her own letters and brackets to use in her opinion that was so obviously writte before she heard one word from the lawyers today. and so, unless an appeals cour