not be in your packet. so it won t be linked to the calendar, the final motion won t be linked to the calendar. we can make it available to the public as soon as it s available. justi just to let you know. so this is coming back next week. thank you, commissioners. president miguel: before we proceed to the next item on the agenda, i know there are a number of people in the audience that are here regarding the booker t. washington community project. it may very well be an hour before we get to that just so they know. thank you. commissioners, we now are on item number 7. case 2010.0080t and the planning code to various sections of the planning code amendments and to various sections of articles 7, 10, and 11. good afternoon, commissioners. tara sullivan from the planning department. the item before you is a comprehensive code cleanup and passed at the july 8 hearing by this commissioner. it is a large document that is in front of you. it is amending mainly clerical errors
and 11 should be considered separate from the cleanup language being proposed. it is very important to consider that and if not, you will have a lot of muddy works before you for a long period of time and thela thing you want to do is combine those thing. i have compared that to prop j and compared that to the charter and i feel that with the additional language that ms. sullivan has brought forward today that this is in compliance and this should be voted on. thank you. president miguel: thank you. penelope clark. i am addressing basically the changes on the section 311. quite frankly, it is very hard to find these changes. we received when we would call the planning department, they would say we can t print it out and didn t mention that the changes are only in section h at the very end, pages 449-451 of the entire document which would have been helpful. and of course, many people are out of town on vacations and certainly i was one of the emailers on the access to issue.
and any substantive changes being suggested to article 10 and 11 should be considered separate from the cleanup language being proposed. it is very important to consider that and if not, you will have a lot of muddy works before you for a long period of time and thela thing you want to do is combine those thing. i have compared that to prop j and compared that to the charter and i feel that with the additional language that ms. sullivan has brought forward today that this is in compliance and this should be voted on. thank you. president miguel: thank you. penelope clark. i am addressing basically the changes on the section 311. quite frankly, it is very hard to find these changes. we received when we would call the planning department, they would say we can t print it out and didn t mention that the changes are only in section h at the very end, pages 449-451 of the entire document which would have been helpful. and of course, many people are out of town on vacations and c
president miguel: is there a second? second. thank you. commissioners, the motion on the floor is to to deny with specific language that would allow it to come back without prejudice if a specific tenant is identified. on that motion, please vote. that motion passes on a 5-2 vote with commissioners antonini and borden voting against. when will this come back, commissioners? can we do it next week? next week would be great for the intent to deny. it won t take that long. we ll put it on the top of the calendar. great. i can have that motion to the commissioners next week. thank you. commissioners, just to state for the public the motion will not be in your packet. so it won t be linked to the calendar, the final motion won t be linked to the calendar. we can make it available to the public as soon as it s available. justi just to let you know. so this is coming back next week. thank you, commissioners. president miguel: before we proceed to the next item on the