security officials are kept in the dark about them. only the president, some members of his cabinet, or a near cabinet level official, could authorize other government officials to no details of these special access programs. now trump s fellow republicans, who had already stuck their neck out for him, without knowing all the facts, always dangerous were left exposed. and struggling to explain why it was, actually find that the ex president kept nuclear documents in the basement of services florida country club. it depends on what the nuclear information is. you can say nuclear weapons. but there are things that are highly, highly classified. there are things that are not extremely classified. but our, nonetheless, classified. the other aspect, with respect to access, is we do not know what those documents are. so, the washington post, had previously reported last month that investigators were looking for information related to nuclear programs in the certain mar-a-la
mar-a-lago, an excuse which he seems to have dropped in recent weeks. now at least according to the washington post, we know it was not a hoax. and even with a month to repair, republicans are still struggling to respond to these latest allegations. do you think it is appropriate, the way that the former president was storing those top secret documents at his residence in mar-a-lago? i don t really have any comments on this whole investigation that has been dominating the news for the last month. i think we are following it like all of you are. documents at mr. a leader, that s important. do you have any comment on that? just sitting here, following all with you. i m mitch mcconnell, i m basically just a dude. the revelations come at a pivotal moment for the investigation into the store documents. this, weekend widely criticized and widely ridiculed ruling, a trump appointed federal judge in florida went over backwards to accommodate trumps late request for a so-cal
weaponization of prosecution is working less and less. this is the bread and butter of local da s office. this is a straightforward fraud case. so it becomes harder and harder to claim that this is politically motivated, what you are accused of doing this just theft. also, we should note, the victims here are hard and die hard trump supporters who gave money to an organization called we build the wall. another legal problem today i want to get you guys your thoughts on, this is involving some federal investigations, of course, federal criminal investigations. we know there s a grand jury of being investigating january 6th. we know some of the people that have come before to testify including mark, your chief staff mike pence, we know pence baloney, he came today we got this interesting kind of incremental development here in the new york times. the fbi agents in florida tried to interview william as russell, who served in the special insistent to and deputy director of the vans a
we know some of the people that have come before to testify including mark, your chief staff mike pence, we know pence baloney, he came today we got this interesting kind of incremental development here in the new york times. the fbi agents in florida tried to interview william as russell, who served in the special insistent to and deputy director of the vans and the white house. to confusion work for mr. trump as a personal aide after the office. and this is someone who doesn t, isn t as high in the orchard as the white house counsel, but presumably is someone that is very close and around donald trump all the time. what do you think of that? i think for prosecutors, for investigators, for the committee, it is a win-win. it s a win-win because you are not going to have the barriers and obstacles of executive privilege or attorney crown client privilege that upheld of some of the questions with respect to the committee and their investigation in the past. this is someone who doesn