security officials are kept in the dark about them. only the president, some members of his cabinet, or a near cabinet level official, could authorize other government officials to no details of these special access programs. now trump s fellow republicans, who had already stuck their neck out for him, without knowing all the facts, always dangerous were left exposed. and struggling to explain why it was, actually find that the ex president kept nuclear documents in the basement of services florida country club. it depends on what the nuclear information is. you can say nuclear weapons. but there are things that are highly, highly classified. there are things that are not extremely classified. but our, nonetheless, classified. the other aspect, with respect to access, is we do not know what those documents are. so, the washington post, had previously reported last month that investigators were looking for information related to nuclear programs in the certain mar-a-la
mar-a-lago, an excuse which he seems to have dropped in recent weeks. now at least according to the washington post, we know it was not a hoax. and even with a month to repair, republicans are still struggling to respond to these latest allegations. do you think it is appropriate, the way that the former president was storing those top secret documents at his residence in mar-a-lago? i don t really have any comments on this whole investigation that has been dominating the news for the last month. i think we are following it like all of you are. documents at mr. a leader, that s important. do you have any comment on that? just sitting here, following all with you. i m mitch mcconnell, i m basically just a dude. the revelations come at a pivotal moment for the investigation into the store documents. this, weekend widely criticized and widely ridiculed ruling, a trump appointed federal judge in florida went over backwards to accommodate trumps late request for a so-cal
the next ten years but some economists say the total will be much higher. welcome to fox news live i m mike emanuel. analysis from the university of pennsylvania found it could rise to more than a trillion dollars over the next decade while many wonder who is footing the bill. lucas tomlinson live from the white house with the latest. good afternoon, lucas. lucas: good afternoon, mike, $1 trillion is roughly the gdp of mexico. now many republicans in the sunday talk shows pushed back on the president s plan, of course, saying it s probably against the law. new hampshire governor telling cnn, quote, it s inherently unfair and fairly illegal and, quote, adds hundreds of billions of dollars of time where we are trying to bring inflation under control. something the plan in effort by president biden to buy votes ahead of the midterm elections in 2020, about 60% of 18 to 29-year-olds voted for biden but last month the number of young voters supporting biden had dropped to just 38%
filing today, there is about four main requests. now, one is for a special master. that s a third party to be appointed by the court, who oversees the review of the evidence, on either side of the parties. another ask they have is to pause the doj from reviewing the evidence until that review by the special master has been completed. they re also seeking a more detailed receipt, shall we say, of the property that was removed from mar-a-lago, and they want doj to give them back whatever not within the scope of that search warrant. now, in this suit, trump argues his constitutional rights have been violated, and now there is also confirmation of previous reporting in this filing that trump tried to get some sort of a message to attorney general merrick garland three days after the search. let s just say that message is probably equal parts unconventional and entitled. it says, counsel for the former president spoke by phone on august 11th to the top counter intelligence officia
money off your, you know, your devoted podcast fan base, but a certain point, that s not gonna work with, like, steve bannon, i don t think he really wants to go to jail in new york state. right. and by wrong? i don t know? maybe he really does? but i don t think you do? i just think there is a complete denial of what this is actually doing. i also think that that narrative about, you know, the weaponization of prosecution is working less and less. this is the bread and butter of local da s office. this is a straightforward fraud case. so it becomes harder and harder to claim that this is politically motivated, what you are accused of doing this just theft. also, we should note, the victims here are hard and die hard trump supporters who gave money to an organization called we build the wall. another legal problem today i want to get you guys your thoughts on, this is involving some federal investigations, of course, federal criminal investigations. we know there s a grand ju