Made substantial that we have one pointed peaks the american its on the ground in afghanistan over 1000. By the end of this year over 10000 and that is part of a trend that at the end of 2016 we will have our military personal act into the embassy. The kind of fulfillment to wind down in to wind down at a very responsible way. Last week the administration and you took about great pains to talk about executive actions. There has been a tremendous amounts of Fact Checking at the washington post. Understanding it is preference that george bush take action not nearly as statistically represented by this administration. Will you either retract that or stop using that in the future . I will not, major. The fact of the matter is the Bush Administration to take an executive action and did have an impact on 1. 5 Million People living in this country and that is about 40 of the population at the time. That has beening reported by the Associated Press, New York Times and the Congressional Researc
Particularly over the last six monthsish, a creation of an arms control committee, as well as with the hlg. The beginning of, okay, what do we need to do to look at confidencebuilding measures, transparency measures in a way that will inspire some reciprocal actions on the part of russia as far as the foundation for reduction. So thats out there. But the commitment on the part of the allies, which i think is part of this, it has its really been very strong, and its a commitment that is really respected in this notion of so the at least in the context of the hrg, burdensharing has been a very important element of this, and we see good, strong consensus on that. So, also in the context of the whole u. S. Nuclear commitment to get to nato. There really is burdensharing. It isnt obvious but it is. Nato common funding, individual nations, and then you have the individual the independent deterrent, the uk, which is provided to nato. So it is good and a pretty strong alliance, that said, the
This case, because to me, the anonymity that is associated with users and their wallets would suggest, i really dont need to try to cover who owns the money. Se, thank you. Im out of time. So were going to pass this on to our ranking member. Thank you. We id love to be at your home as e youre explaining to your wife how your Virtual Company gave you a virtual paycheck, using virtual money, but that being ry the case, i assume your business wants more consumers than investors. We are just a merchandise acquirer. We only facilitate payments for the merchants. Were strictly focusing on business acception and adoption of bit coin. T would im just wondering what woulr happen if someone like senator warner cornered the market on vi virtual coins. How would that impact the consumer marketplace . We l its interesting. We look at bit coin being traded in open markets today. Very and china is getting very aggressive in the open market. If we want america to remain a w leader in technology and in
And then the company suck. Com ad gets founded and somebody sets up a fake Facebook Page and pretends to be that company and that Company Loses significant reputation when they choose to stick their head in the sand ann not engage and not Pay Attention to whats happening. Th so my concern, with not getting into regulating this area and being interested in what happens here, is that it will be it could eventually affect our Financial Systems reputation. U. And i understand that. My point is frequently in thesen situations, we think about how t were going to fix it, or facilitate it when we maybe we should leave it alone and warn r people, youre on your own. I think from a consumer a perspective and a user perspective, that this is where we are. Is and i think thats a very fair , point. Stions. Well, we are all left with ao lot of questions. Were going to turn to senator n schumer. First to followup on some of those questions, the separationb of the Payment System to the banking system,
Washington, d. C. , june 19, 2014. I hereby appoint the honorable charles j. Fleischmann to act as speaker pro tempore on this day. Signed, john a. Boehner, speaker of the house of representatives. The speaker pro tempore pursuant to the order of the house of january 7, 2014, the chair will now recognize members from lists submitted by the majority and minority leaders for morning hour ebate. The chair will alternate recognition between the parties with each party limited to one hour and each member other than the majority and minority leaders and the minority whip each, to five minutes in no event shall debate continue beyond 11 50 a. M. The chair recognizes the gentleman from illinois, mr. Gutierrez, for five minutes. The chair will receive a message. The messenger mr. Speaker, a message from the senate. The secretary mr. Speaker. The speaker pro tempore madam secretary. The secretary i have been directed by the senate to inform the house that the senate has agreed that the senate ha