about why it may be constitutional. it s very clear it s wrong. i want to get your response to the news this morning of mass immigration raids set to start in cities across the country over the weekend. this makes america less safe. look, i don t think anybody disagrees that there ought to be law enforcement protecting people from danger. that s not what this is about. this is targeting people who are caught in a broken system where there should be a path wway to citizenship. if rumors go on about raids let alone if it happens, it makes the community less safe. it makes people less likely to participate in the economy, less likely to talk to law enforce ment when they need help dealing with something that really is a matter of danger. it s designed to strike fear into people at a moment when fear is something we have way too much of in this country. it s masking the fact there s been a total failure on the part
a path wway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. turn that around on the debate stage on ted cruz and suggest that he supports legal status, something that many iowa republicans those saying they will go out and caucus for ted cruz do not support. it s becoming so incredibly intense between the two of them. it s all about iowa. it is. iowa, february 1st, got it on my calendar. dana bash, you do as well. thank you so much. the republican presidential candidates are on the road today. it s still quite the crowded field with more than a dozen stul vying for the job. many still in single digits in the polls. so when is it time to call it quits? who needs to say bye-bye? claire malone is with me today. has been talking about what s called this drop out draft. kand of like the fantasy football of politics. also is jamie weinstein. so good to see both of you.
states where it is not legal or not. we begin this hour with a free speech decision from the highest court in the land. unanimous decision that could make prime time television even less family friendly than it is now. our justice correspondent joe johns joining me now with a pretty i guess you could say eye opening details. let s talk about what is at issue here. and how this is a coup for broadcasters. that s true. but i caution that we probably shouldn t go too far in calling this a sweeping ruling. this is an ball what goes on broadcast tv and how much power the federal communication commission has to regulate it after the fact that dhoept have a rule in place to handle the situation. we are talking about three incidents here, two concerned, isolated utterances of obscene words during two live broadcast aired by fox television stations, the third occurrence occurred during an episode of a television program broadcast by the abc television network. this goes tall way