to change things up a little bit and here is why. the phrase no longer achieves the goal. it became a distraction with the controversy of the events of what is going on. so what they did was they changed the job destroying, it gets the same point across but they are back to framing the issue which is what they need to do. shannon: what are some of the best and worst examples you have seen out there of using language to get your point across, especially in the political realm? rhetoric has always been used to help pass bills. look at newt gingrich. his contract with america. that worked because it was different. people thought okay, shared responsibility, shared goals accountability, it is a contract after all and that resonated with people. juxtapose that with president obama s single payor healthcare and people were like what is that i don t know what to think about that. it was marketed horribly and therefore it never gained any traction. rhetoric is very powerful. shannon: let
their sentiment and objection, but they re legislators. they re elected to make laws, pass bills. congress controls the pursestrings. to not do that would be a complete abdication, so today a largely-symbolic expression of their opposition, but opposition that s not likely to last all that long. jon: carl cameron on capitol hill for us. thanks. jenna: but until the deal s done, it s not done. jon: no. jenna: right? that s the bottom line. chris stirewalt is fox news digital politics editor. chris, we re looking so much at this story from the side of democrats in the house disagreeing with the white house. but you wrote a little bit today about something else we should be watching for, and that s republican support for this bill. what s your gauge on that? reporter: well, look, jenna, this is a very serious negotiation, and this is, as they would say, a near-run thing. it is no certainly that certainty that this measure s going to goat through the senate, and it becomes very doubtfu