Situation with the penthouse in view of a number of homes in and about it is visible more than the inadequately modifications to a project but i again, i defer to the board on its determination about that athletic qualities but want to emphasis the hostage and truthfulness that jeff and i have put forward that was discovered on the sight permit we realized there was some movements 6 to 8 feet and that was a modification made in the addenda not typical in that public fashion i wanted to finish as well i dont feel terribly comfortable talking about the limits of the boards jurisdiction and im not going to arrest ill defer to the City Attorney on this this is a project that has been accomplished and invested under state law a valid Building Permit and significant signatures into the building including the payment for the slate and construction and expenditures have been made this i dont want to august that ill leave that for the attorney and questions. The 8 feet you referenced was your a
Of suspension on the basis that the da record becau erred. It comes from the release of suspense itself it says if the release is done in part because the project is constructed in substantial to the approved plan you could say the error the board can find not in substantial conformity. That make sense. Thats my motion. Okay. The motion by the president to grant appeal and overturn the release of suspension that the Zoning Administrator erred because the building is not been constructed with the approved plan on that motion you commissioner fung. Commissioner Vice President honda. Commissioner wilson and commissioner swig okay that motion carries and the release of suspension is over turned and blocked commissioner president lazarus no madam clerk, any other business before this committee . Were the commission will please come to order at secretary will call roll commissioner taylormcghee commissioner chow commissioner chung commissioner sanchez and commissioner walker second item it d
Electronic Health Care Records system and the department of Public Health division as well as implementing the Affordable Health care act the city budget also vests to support the most vulnerable san franciscans and it includes resources dedicated to help San Francisco General Hospital adding 5 hundred new Supportive Housing for people to the Navigation Center and millions of new fund to support seniors and people with disabilities covered california has a modest rate interest for San Francisco for 2016 they recalling reduce the prices in San Francisco, california expect an average rate of 4 percentage across all terse this is more than all the regions in Northern California we had a great anniversary of the 50th anniversary of medicare and medical celebration of medicaid on july 30th, 1965, president s johnson signed the medical and medicare for pregnant women and people with disabilities medal and medicare has protected health and improving the nations Economic Security on july thurs
Thank you. Next speaker, please good morning for once supervisors. Eric [inaudible] with various groups including San Francisco clean energy advocates. The other problem with i [inaudible] measure is it will set different standards for pge so it can get away with calling [inaudible] when we couldntit was silly. On what is happening today, advocates want to make very clear that ibw made an agreement that after you vote on this in the hearing and send it forward they will send out a press release immediately announcing their intention tooz campaign against their measure and for our measure including putting a ballot statement saying dont vote for this, vote for the other one. Advocates need to see that happened before you all at the board in about a halfhour vote to send it forward. If doesnt happen i know it is drag to be here friday, but you need to hold that vote until the press release goes out or we feel we dont have a deal and if we lose quorum and have to go to a pal balt misher f
In our first hour, we will look at the details of this decision by the Trump Administration. Your thoughts on the proposed change, and the larger issue from the federal governments role when it comes to the topic of Greenhouse Gas emissions. It is a call and let us know your thoughts this morning. 202 7488001, republicans. 202 7488000, democrats. Independents, 202 7488002. If you want to reach out to us twitter, you can do that at cspanwj. The Washington Times picks of this decision that started yesterday about the trump theistration, saying longawaited announcement by epa administrator scott pruitt will kickstart repeal proceedings on the rule which limits carbonate Carbon Emissions and was exquisite way designed to reduce the amount of coal burned across the country. This will be challenged in court, with environmental groups and democratic parties quickly vowing to fight any move to repeal the ccp. But the epa chief says he is on solid legal footing, and that the repeal will save as