Some level of oversight around that money that comes through. From my understanding of it, the puc is generally and the commission has acted to say when you do receive any of these mitigations that they be used to sure up the transmission lines or some of the other things that its meant to mitigate, that via contract or the intention was for mitigation fee, correct . Thats correct. And so, i think whats going to happen is if we have every 100,000 to the budget and finance committee for the same purpose over and over again, that might earn be the best and highest use of our time. Not the puc has come up with alternatives to make sure we still have oversight over it. Can you explain that a bit . Yeah, i think we would recommend that those funds be held on the controllers reserve and we work with the controller to provide reports to the board on expenditures of funds in excess of 100,000 so that it can be done in effect an administrative matter but still reported to the board in a way the
Document on how you can rent one of our facilities. Yes, dr. Marat. I had two questions. Theres been tension sometimes with schools themselves expecting whatever money is generated. I wondered if you can forward that. Secondly, what about parking lot fundraisers when schools use their school yards as parking lots, is that also included in this somehow . Yes, so to your first question, we do have a resolution that was passed by 25 percent of the net that goes back to the schools and unfortunately we havent finished calculating the revenue because right now we dont have a system to help us keep track of all the permits and all the revenues thats why we need this new system. I have this spread sheet. I have to go through all 15,000 permits each school year. To go through them and see which one qualifies for the 25 percent. And then each permit i have to manually calculate the cost to get the net revenue and take 25 percent and then apply it to each school. So its taking up a lot of my tim
Communicating the actual new fees and making it make sense. I have to say, we know that we have to communicate this very well because its incredibly complicated and there is a lot very much at stake for groups especially the many many small organizations that run enrichment and after school cites who would really struggle to pay the full cost but we are also finding that there is a direct cost to the district for the facilities use for the operations part of it, we are working with a really complicate bunch of data to make it as fair and possible but not to have that general fund which serves everyone in classrooms. Our next phase involves the outdoor use of space and there is use of our facilities over the summer which is another time when its very complicated because there is a lot of construction and a lot of repairs and a lot of deep cleaning that has to happen and a lot of programs for our students that needs to make that happen. We are looking to some experts to help us navigate
Oh, we dont have enough, oh, can you absolutely not. Our staff, our School Fights serve Children First and for most and one of the open, but its very clear that there is a cost to that process and i dont have any issue in telling them what that cost entails because that site is for educating students and really folks have to understand that. I think its relatively easy when we keep the idea of what were about in the forefront of our mind and we remind people what our school sites are about and i have no problem whatsoever explaining that to every Single Person that has come to me for some kind of path and that is from every community member, every personal friend, he have elected official in this town, what it cost to rent out one of our school cost so i think all of us need to be educated up and maybe i can help. Im going to create a onepage document on how you can rent one of our facilities. Yes, dr. Marat. I had two questions. Theres been tension sometimes with schools themselves ex
These mitigations that they be used to sure up the transmission lines or some of the other things that its meant to mitigate, that via contract or the intention was for mitigation fee, correct . Thats correct. And so, i think whats going to happen is if we have every 100,000 to the budget and finance committee for the same purpose over and over again, that might earn be the best and highest use of our time. Not the puc has come up with alternatives to make sure we still have oversight over it. Can you explain that a bit . Yeah, i think we would recommend that those funds be held on the controllers reserve and we work with the controller to provide reports to the board on expenditures of funds in excess of 100,000 so that it can be done in effect an administrative matter but still reported to the board in a way the board feels like it has full knowledge and ability to control it if there is something going awry. Why dont we go to the budget Analyst Report. [speaker not understood] repor