Paolo Verdi News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Correct . Yes or no . Im not going to do that. But you did say that. Are you expanding your authority here with this proposal . No. None whatsoever. No. Why have the new rule, then . Because the existing rule, as i mentioned, is based on flawed approaches to determining jurisdiction, is actually more broad than the Supreme Court has asked us to let me ask you this, then. Do you believe that this rule improves the overall clarity of epas jurisdiction or authority . Yes or no . Yes. You think it does. Well, youre absolutely incorrect. You can see the questions were asking here. This rule is not needed. The Supreme Court didnt tell you to make a new rule. It said that you could, and to me, its expanding the authority in breach of the epa, and thats the reason theres so much discontent all across this country, not only in my state of georgia but in every state in this country because you all are expanding your authority. You talked about if anybody wants to put a pollutant into water, they

United statesMaricopa countySalt riverLake pleasantCapitol hillElizabeth ames jonesClaire mccaskillJohn thuneKenneth feinbergWilliam pullmanAtlantic oceanRobert smithMary barraPaolo verdiSupreme courtSupreme court asked