Is and communities need to know what that is, soy hope that we urge that plan to be public as soon as possible so we all know what to expect. Thank you. Thank you, senator murray. Senator burr. Thank you, mr. Chairman. After working on pandemic policy now for 17 years, im reminded this morning tony fauci has been doing it twice as long as i have and most of you at the dais have been doing that as well. I urge my colleagues to Pay Attention to what each of these individuals say because some things are predictable up here. Congress is a fullfledged partner and funds things when theres an urgent need, a threat thats out there, and and i know, tony, youve seen over the years when theres not that threat out there things get shellofed like platforms that we could have developed and had better countermeasures today, platforms that then could address vaccines at a much faster pace than maybe what were doing but we spend more time with the blame game than we do with focuses on how the future sh
What do you think . Call numbers on your screen. Or you can put your voice on the program via twitter, facebook and send us an maul email theere is the front page of wall street journal today. The lead headlines says egyptians are bracing for more bloodshed. There is a photo of egyptian soldiers guarding an area around a mosque in cairo where security crackdown left hundreds dead on the previous day. That number is close to 600 now with fights more expected. At the beginning of this piece goes this way. The deadly fight in egypts treets host josh rogan is here with us. Guest good morning. Host so tell us about this question. What is your sense of the aid issue at this point and roll into your answer. How much aid are we talking about . What does it mean to the country of i didnt want and what egypt and what kind of leverage does it have to the u. S. . Sure. The u. S. Is committed to giving 1. 3 million to the military aid and other support for the civilian government. The military aid
The country as it relates to states sovereignty. These are the reactions by states to federal law and what the states are trying to do about it in some cases. Our guests this morning at the table are ilya shapiro of the cato institute. Hes a senior fellow for constitutional studies, good morning. Good morning. We are also joined by Ian Millhiser senior constitution policy analyst, appreciate your time. Let me try to set this up by reading the beginning part of a politico piece published recently. And the piece says that infuriated by what they see as the long arm of washington reaching into their business, states are increasingly telling the feds keep out. Bills that would negate a variety of federal laws have popped up this year in the vast yorte of states with the amount of antifederal legislation sharply oun the rise during the obama sharply on the rise during the Obama Administration. Mr. Millhiser, get us started what kind of laws . Guest you have to go back to the early terrorist
Individuals, with disabilities. And two, to allow the departments to fill the vacant positions with qualified individuals. And three, to increase the diversity of the city. And now turning the page on the overhead, and i am continuing with the bullet points in my presentation. So proposition a was approved by the voters and the charter was amended and a new Civil Service rule was implemented, i think that those are my notes. And but any way, was implemented and that was Civil Service rule, 34, that later became Civil Service 115, which is what we are speaking about today. And Civil Service rule the title of it is rules related to the employment of persons with disabilities. And so what are the requirements of Civil Service rule 115 . And it will allows for the applicanted to be appointed to permanent exempt positions and entry level classifications and it is important that i stipulate right here, that when we say entry level positions, that disnot mean that these are you know going to
Electronic devices and completed speaker cards and copies of documented should be submitted to the clerk and items acted upon today will be appearing on the june 15th, agenda unless otherwise stated. Thank you. Please, call item number one. Hearing to consider that the transfer of a type 48 onsale general public premises license for the expansion of premises located at 246 kearny street district 3 to brian sheehy for future beverages inc. , dba rick house, will serve the public convenience or necessity of the city and county of San Francisco. Neighborhood Services and Safety Committee thank you. And we have a report from staff . Is that right . And this is not a traditional transfer of the liquor license, it is the expansion of an existing premises, which is a bar on kearny street and it resulted in us losing 40 percent of the Square Footage of the bar, and exchange for that Square Footage we are offered basement space and space at the rear of the existing bar, that space has been reno