That is right, you cannot ignore those discussions. Thank you to you for putting them front and center, and to david for the good work he does it have a great evening and great weekend, guys. Thank you at home for joining us this evening. One of the most important criminal cases against donald trump has been on lifesupport for weeks now but as of today, it appears that the case will live. The former president will likely have to face trial. For the past two months, we have watched as the Georgia Election interference case against donald trump and 14 Co Defendants devolved into a high stakes sideshow. Several of the defendants in this case accused fani willis of having a relationship with the Special Prosecutor on her team, nathan wade. A relationship that created the Conflict Of Interest. They argued that because of that relationship, fani willis needed to be thrown off the case, a move that would effectively kill any chance of this case ever getting to trial. Last month, d. A. Willis
cnn newsroom. i m jim acosta in washington. we begin the hour with two dueling lawsuits and two separate states, putting the national spotlight back on the issue of abortion rights. in texas. a federal judge has ruled that the fda is more than two decades old approval of the drug wordpress stone should be halted . this is one of the most trusted and widely used drugs for medication abortions. the court did pause the ruling for one week so that an appeal which is already underway can be filed . president biden vowed late friday night that he will fight the ruling in texas. meantime in washington state, a federal judge moved to protect access to that very same. abortion medication across 17 democratic led states and the district of columbia. cnn s rosa flores is in houston forest. rosa walk us through both the judge s order and how we got here. this is a very big story down in texas, where you are. you know, it absolutely is. and this judge judge matthews has merrick really did
safety and privacy. when walker categorically denied the story and said he didn t know who was making this allegation, the woman, a registered democrat, whose relationship with walker continued after the abortion, told the daily beast her chief concern with revealing her name was because she is the mother of one of walker s children. she wanted to protect her family s privacy as best she could while coming forward with the truth. walker has publically acknowledged that their child is his own and the woman proved she s the child s mother and provided credible evidence of a long-term relationship with herschel walker. nbc news has not independently confirmed this reporting. walker is once again denying some, all of the allegations, telling nbc there s, quote, no truth to it. in his denials, the woman tells the daily beasts it s his hypocrisy that spurred her to come forward. she s the mother of one of his four kids. he did not accept responsibility for the kid we did have t
absolutely is. and this judge judge matthews has merrick really didn t hold back in the 67 page order. he ripped apart the fda approval of this drug method press tone, saying that the fda approval was flawed that it didn t consider the risks to women and girls. let me take you through some of the specific language that this judge used in this order this judge saying that the fda s refusal to impose certain restrictions on this drug quote resulted in many deaths and many more severe or life threatening adverse reactions it goes on to say due to the fda is lax reporting requirements. the exact number is not ascertainable, but it is likely far greater, far higher than its data indicate goes on to say whatever the numbers are , they likely would be considerably lower. had the fda not acquiesce to the pressure to increase access to chemical abortion at the expense of women s safety. now there have been many medical organizations that have been issuing statements about this fact checking wha
who will even gauge in voter suppression, but celebrate it and at the same time only chastise those who lie about the outcome, we re only paying attention to one of the side of the equation, but if we don t solve both sides, democracy falls. you could push back against the suppression bills as a single party. how do you make it a bipartisan effort to say listen if you are so confident that you re on the right side of history, why don t you help me expand access to the right to vote. unfortunately because right now this is all about winning. and we know that brian camep. there is a 288 page order that came down from a federal court. the last three claims during our fair fight action. we did not win the claims. but if he read the 288 page order repeatedly the federal judge said that brian kemp operated a racist discriminatory