Conditioned on various things in state cooperation in state enactment and regulations on federal requirements. In the finance committee, the origin of the aca 2002 with the tax credit offered and put in place in that year. The statutory provisions identified in the chairmans mark of the aca as the statutory precursor language that would be modified and build upon in enacting the statute. In fact, the structure of using coverage month as a basis for the part of how you define eligibility wasnt not found in a prior statutory language, a contracted the same committee. Experts propose doing it here. People that know a lot about health care. One example, professor tim jones, one of the most Prominent Health care professors in the country, significant enough to be invited to the white house when the statue was signed off authored a paper saying if were going to do a Seed Exchange model, we can come up with various ways of encouraging states to cooperate. One of the things we can do is we can
Proffered interpretation to see if those substantive effects are compatible with the statute as a whole and to see which interpretation is more consistent with the design and object of the statutory structure. As i said, that was a Supreme Court case. Those of you listening in the audience who are not familiar with recent Supreme Court cases might want to reject that reasoning as being maybe one of the liberal justices. It might have been our friend Justice Briar for a 54 majority with some purposebased argument. But no, that was Justice Scalia talking about his version of strict text chul interpretation. That should not be surprising. Its not the sort of psycho analysis or sort of general appeal to purpose that youve heard some liberals make and some advocates for the government, certainly not the liberal argument that was set forward as sort of a foil by my colleagues on the right, rather when Justice Scalia talks about intent, purpose, object, design, he is not talking about what he
Establish by the state is not used anywhere else in the statute except in provisions that are serving that purpose. Now, in terms of why would congress do this because this is the question. Why would congress think to do Something Like this . The condition achievement of goals on state cooperation. They did that on medicaid. They offered a lot of inducement on medicaid. Because congress cant come comen dear, everyone knew that congress could make states a really good offer but it had to be an offer. The state that refused to accept the Medicaid Expansion as the statute was written would leave the poorest and most Vulnerable People in that state without any help under the medicaid program. Thats the way the statute was written. Conditioning a whole lot of the statutes goals on states willingness to go along. They would do that with medicaid where a lot more is at stake. Why wouldnt they do it here . Congress has done this before. Congress has routinely said tax credits or other benefits
Networks, friday night starting at 8 00 eastern on cspan, our campaign 2014 debate coverage continues in prime time. On saturday night at 8 00, the funeral for former Washington Post editor ben bradley. Sunday evening at 8 00 on q a, author harold holser on lincoln and the press. Chris tomlinson on the story of two families, one white and one black and the slave plantation that bears their name. Pulitzer prize winning author james mechanic fcpherson on jef davis. And a threehour conversation with mike the porter. One of the first africanamerican labor unions, the brotherhood of sleeping car porters. Saturday night at 8 00 on electric shurs in history, propaganda and americas view of the japanese during world war ii. Sunday afternoon at 4 00 on real america, a 1936 film on tuberculosis in america. Find their Television Schedule at cspan. Org. Let us know what you think about the programs youre watching. Call 2026263400. Email us at comments pennsylvania cspan. Org or send us a tweet csp
Today more than two months after a deadly crash in San Francisco the driver who caused the collision is being charged. Gamp, im tori campbell. 16yearold kevin sam was riding in a van with his mother and sister when they were rear ended back in september. Katie stevenson was there as they announced the charges a short time ago. Anne has learned new details about the investigation that led up to the announcement. David . Garden tori. Police back in september booked jimmy zoo on a vehicular manslaughter charges, they said today she will be facing felony charges, felony vehicular manslaughter and two counts of reckless driving causing injury. This is the result of a september crash in which they say she was going as fast as 70, not 80 hours, in her mercedes suv before she rear ended a minivan, that killed kevin sam. Sams sister was injured, and his mother, a salsalito post office work arer, has suffered a broken spine. The suv accelerated without warning and says she did not remember makin