sod a lot oque franf really ine and quite frankly, startling d details. et d the devilon is inal the deo and i ll trump had no basis, no reason, no legal basis to retain those documents at mart r a lago. e there could be numerous there could be numerous just donald trumadp as well as additional crimes that coulds be charged. hee getting th is she kidding me? now, she mightat be getting tht idea from one of the smalls parts of the affidavit that was curiously left unredacted likerr on page thirty . we re referring to presidentum trump and p and those around hi quote, criminal parties, but stilstl didn t provide any evidence to prove it. it also warned that t releasinthgs team the affidavit would give trump and his team the opportunity to flee t or destroy evidence stord electronically and otherwise fleed . on really, trump s plane has hisan name on itde and destroyhing electronic evidence. do they mean doing something like, i don t know, deleting lit thirty three thousa
on the president s home? over halfr is redacted.raidd and you may remember i washi on the show the day of the raid and i said this is an doj incredible act by the doj and one would fully expect transparency. i expected a statement immediately, some sort ofme communication to the americadian people. us dt tookeman three daysto of us demanding thatbe for there to be a statement. they released and even then whenh they released the search warrant, it told us nothing.u ra and so yourk you remarked a ver good point.th there was a letter by the trump attorneys that said this is ourn basis for saying that, you know, there s nothing to see here. we have done nothing wrong. make sure you include this letter. y motion o if you do anything with theatio court by motion or application, anurt by motion or application, and then they redact any sortn t of explanation or would explain why they needed to go in. and so i think, again, we have a another act, another revelation, another document releasedn